Table 1

Summary of findings

OutcomesIllustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)Relative effect (95% CI)Number of participants (studies)Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed riskCorresponding risk
ControlZinc
All-cause mortality
Follow-up: 17–72 weeks
LowRR 0.95 (0.86 to 1.05)138 302 (13 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
2400/1 000 0002280/1 000 000 (2064 to 2520)
High
34 900/1 000 00033 155/1 000 000 (30 014 to 36 645)
Mortality due to all-cause diarrhoea
Follow-up: 52–69 weeks
LowRR 0.95 (0.69 to 1.31)132 321 (4 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate†
800/1 000 000760/1 000 000 (552 to 1048)
High
3000/1 000 0002850/1 000 000 (2070 to 3930)
Mortality due to LRTI
Follow-up: 52–69 weeks
LowRR 0.86 (0.64 to 1.15)132 063 (3 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate†
1200/1 000 0001032/1 000 000 (768 to 1380)
High
3000/1 000 0002580/1 000 000 (1920 to 3450)
Mortality due to malaria
Follow-up: 46–69 weeks
LowRR 0.90 (0.77 to 1.06)42 818 (2 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate†
7400/1 000 0006660/1 000 000 (5698 to 7844)
High
14 200/1 000 00012 780/1 000 000 (10 934 to 15 052)
Incidence of all-cause diarrhoea
Follow-up: 12–72 weeks
LowRR 0.87 (0.85 to 0.89)15 042 (35 studies)⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low‡§
20 000/1 000 00017 400/1 000 000 (17 000 to 17 800)
High
1 770 000/1 000 0001 539 900/1 000 000 (1 504 500 to 1 575 300)
Incidence of LRTI
Follow-up: 12–52 weeks
LowRR 1.00 (0.94 to 1.07)9610 (12 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
30 000/1 000 00030 000/1 000 000 (28 200 to 32 100)
High
370 000/1 000 000370 000/1 000 000 (347 800 to 395 900)
Incidence of malaria
Follow-up: 24–47 weeks
LowRR 1.05 (0.95 to 1.15)2407 (4 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate¶
140 000/1 000 000147 000/1 000 000 (133 000 to 161 000)
High
2 950 000/1 000 0003 097 500/1 000 000 (2 802 500 to 3 392 500)
Height
Follow-up: 10–60 weeks
The mean height in the control groups was −1 HAZThe mean height in the intervention groups was 0.1 HAZ better (0 to 0.2 better)SMD 0.09 (0.06 to 0.13)13 669 (51 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate**
Participants with one vomiting episode
Follow-up: 24–52 weeks
LowRR 1.29 (1.14 to 1.46)35 192 (4 studies)⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
17 500/1 000 00022 575/1 000 000 (19 950 to 25 550)
High
300 600/1 000 000387 774/1 000 000 (342 684 to 438 876)
  • GRADE working group grades of evidence.

  • High quality: further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

  • Moderate quality: further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

  • Low quality: further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

  • Very low quality: we are very uncertain about the estimate.

  • *The basis for the assumed risk (eg, the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

  • †Few deaths were observed overall.

  • ‡I2=88%.

  • §Trim-and-fill analysis suggests that the effect may be overestimated due to publication bias.

  • ¶I2=44%.

  • **I2=86%.

  • LRTI, lower respiratory tract infection; SMD, standardised mean difference.