Table 2

Design-specific criteria to assess for risk of bias*

Risk of biasCriterionCohortCase– controlCase seriesCross-sectional
Selection biasWere participants analysed within the groups they were originally assigned to?x
Did the study apply inclusion/exclusion criteria uniformly to all comparison groups?xx
Were cases and controls selected appropriately (eg, appropriate diagnostic criteria or definitions, equal application of exclusion criteria to case and controls, sampling not influenced by exposure status)?x
Did the strategy for recruiting participants into the study differ across study groups?x
Does the design or analysis control account for important confounding and modifying variables through matching, stratification, multivariable analysis or other approaches?xxxx
Performance biasDid researchers rule out any impact from a concurrent intervention or an unintended exposure that might bias results?xxxx
Did the study maintain fidelity to the intervention protocol?xxx
Attrition biasIf attrition (overall or differential non-response, dropout, loss to follow-up or exclusion of participants) was a concern, were missing data handled appropriately (eg, intention-to-treat analysis and imputation)?xxxx
Detection biasIn prospective studies, was the length of follow-up different between the groups, or in case-control studies, was the time period between the intervention/exposure and outcome the same for cases and controls?xx
Were the outcome assessors blinded to the intervention or exposure status of participants?xxxx
Were interventions/exposures assessed/defined using valid and reliable measures, implemented consistently across all study participants?xxxx
Were outcomes assessed/defined using valid and reliable measures implemented consistently across all study participants?xxxx
Were confounding variables assessed using valid and reliable measures implemented consistently across all study participants?xxxx
Reporting biasWere the potential outcomes prespecified by the researchers? Are all prespecified outcomes reported?xxxx
  • *Adapted from Viswanathan et al.18