Table 1

Diagnostic accuracy estimates of TRUS-guided biopsy, mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy used in the base case analysis

Index testSensitivitySpecificityReference testSource and patient population
TRUS-guided biopsy50%
(16/34 patients, 95% CIs 27% to 73%)
α=25, β=25
90%
(57/62 patients, 95% CIs 78% to 97%)
α=45, β=5
Whole-mount pathologyLecornet et al16: simulated biopsy results on digitally reconstructed prostates of 96 men who had undergone surgery for bladder cancer which revealed prostate cancer
mpMRI80%
(252/302, 95% CIs 66% to 90%)
α=40, β=5
60%
(154/253 patients, 95% CIs 45% to 76%)
α=30, β=20
TRUS-guided extended systematic biopsies (10–12 core) plus two targeted biopsies for those with any area suspicious on mpMRI (score ≥3)Haffner et al17: 555 men with suspected localised prostate defined as raised PSA of >3–4 ng/mL and/or abnormal DRE with no clinical or biological suspicion of stage T>3 or metastases and had no prior biopsy
MRI-targeted biopsy80%
(94/121 patients, 95% CIs 66% to 90%)
α=40, β=10
90%
Assumed to be equivalent to the specificity of TRUS-guided biopsy, (57/62 patients, 95% CIs 78% to 97%) α=45, β=5
20 sector-TPMKasivisvanathan et al19: 182 men who had a suspicious lesion on mpMRI; 78 of whom were biopsy naive, 32 had a prior negative biopsy and 72 had a prior positive biopsy
  • TRUS, transrectal ultrasound; TPM, template mapping biopsy; mpMRI, multiparametric MRI; MRI-TB, MRI-targeted biopsy. Data inputs were rounded to the nearest 5%. Beta distributions were estimated using the integer form in Excel according to the parameters α and β.