Table 1

Characteristics of participants and association with glaucoma drainage device exposure by univariable analysis

Participant characteristics (n=1073)Total number (%)Number with exposure (%)p ValueOR (95% CI)
Gender  0.011 2.00 (1.17 to 3.43)
Male483 (45)20 (4)
Female590 (55)47 (8)
Race  0.044* 1.69 (1.01 to 2.83)
White550 (51)43 (8)
Black503 (47)24 (5)
 Other20 (2)0
Diabetes  0.296 0.76 (0.45 to 1.28)
 Present300 (28)23 (34)
 Not present711 (66)42 (63)
 Unknown62 (6)2 (3)
Uveitis  0.410 0.78 (0.44 to 1.40)
History of uveitis209 (20)8 (12)
No history of uveitis649 (60)47 (70)
Unknown215 (20)12 (18)
Glaucoma drainage device  0.203* 0.67 (0.42 to 1.16)
Ahmed598 (56)43 (7)
Baerveldt470 (44)24 (5)
 Molteno4 (<1)0
 Shocket1 (<1)0
Patch graft material  0.174* 1.50 (0.85 to 2.65)
Eye bank sclera591 (55)43 (7)
Tutoplast sclera363 (34)18 (5)
 Sclera NOS75 (7)4 (5)
 Single-layer Tutoplast pericardium39 (4)2 (5)
 Double-layer Tutoplast pericardium14 (1)0
 Unknown1 (<1)0
Location  0.955 1.03 (0.40 to 2.63)
Superior991 (92)62 (6)
Inferior82 (8)5 (6)
Total number of glaucoma drainage devices in eye  0.125† 0.65 (0.37 to 1.13)
 One817 (76)49
 Two175 (16)16
 Three24 (2)2
 Four1 (<1)0
Valuep Value
Age (years, mean±SD; median)64±16; 6665±16; 690.335
  • *p Values and ORs derived from Fishers Exact test for comparison of exposure for italicised variables (other variables in that category with insufficient data points for analysis).

  • †p Value for comparison of a single glaucoma drainage device versus multiple glaucoma drainage devices in the same eye.

  • NOS, not otherwise specified.