Table 2

Comparison of risk factors between latex sensitised (skin prick test positive) and non-sensitised (skin prick test (APT) negative) healthcare workers at King Edward VIII Hospital, KwaZulu-Natal South Africa (n=501)

CharacteristicsLatex SPT positive (29) N (%)Latex SPT negative (472) N (%)
Demographics
Age (years)
 ≤301 (3.5)48 (10.2)
 >30–4013 (44.8)148 (31.4)
 >40–508 (27.6)152 (32.2)
 >507 (24.1)124 (26.3)
Duration of employment
 ≤53 (10.3)64 (13.6)
 >5–1016 (55.2)151 (31.9)
 >10–153 (10.3)63 (13.4)
 >15–201 (3.5)43 (9.1)
 >206 (20.7)151 (31.9)
Sex (yes)
 Male5 (17.2)118 (25.0)
 Female24 (82.8)354 (75.0)
Job title (yes)
 Administrative5 (17.2)159 (33.7)
 Professional nurses5 (17.2)118 (25.0)
 Enrolled nurses14 (48.3)127 (26.9)
 Enrolled nursing assistants5 (17.2)68 (14.4)
Latex exposure
 Exposure status (yes)24 (82.8)313 (66.3)
Type of gloves
 None5 (17.2)165 (34.6)
 Exclusive powdered latex glove (yes)2 (6.9)36 (7.6)
 Exclusive powder-free latex glove (yes)*11 (37.9)77 (16.3)
 Mixed (yes)11 (37.9)198 (41.9)
Medical and personal history
 Personal history of allergy disease (yes)16 (55.2)214 (45.3)
 Family history of allergy disease (yes)18 (62.1)281 (59.5)
 Fruit allergy (yes)*5 (17.2)33 (6.9)
 Previous open surgery (yes)18 (62.1)211 (44.7)
 Non-occupational latex exposure (yes)12 (41.4)225 (47.7)
 Reaction to other latex medical devices (yes)*3 (10.3)8 (1.7)
  • χ2, *p<0.05.

  • †Latex skin prick test positive.

  • ‡Latex skin prick test positive and work-related clinical symptoms of allergy.