Table 4

CONSORT harms criteria reported across included reviews

Bagul (2012)14Breau (2011)15Turner (2011)16Shukralla (2011)17Capili (2009)18Pitrou (2009)20Haidich (2009)21
Total no. of trials included in review4115220515210133102
CONSORT Recommendation% of trials (95% CI) that adhered to each recommendation
(1) Title & Abstract20 (9, 35)12 (6, 20)
1i) 12 (6, 20)
1ii) 64 (53, 74)
21 (16, 27)88 (81, 92)NR71 (63, 79)76 (67, 84)
(2) Introduction34 (20, 51)54 (43, 65)4 (2, 8)74 (67, 81)NRNR48 (38, 58)
(3) Definition of adverse events0 (0, 9)15 (8, 24)6 (3, 11)3a) 36 (29, 45)
3b) 32 (25, 40)
3c) 47 (39, 55)
3d) 16 (11, 23)
3e) 22 (15, 29)
10 (0, 45)16 (10, 23)59 (49, 69)
(4) Collection of harms data10 (3, 23)4i) 22 (14, 32)
4ii) 6 (2, 13)
4iii) 0 (0, 4)
17 (12, 22)4a) 57 (49, 65)
4b) 76 (69, 83)
4c) 33 (26, 42)
20 (3, 56)89 (82, 94)81 (74, 89)
(5) Analysis of harms0 (0, 9)76 (66, 84)6 (3, 10)5a) 36 (28, 44)
5b) 7 (4, 13)
20 (3, 56)12 (7, 19)44 (34, 54)
(6) Withdrawals51 (35, 67)35 (25, 45)30 (24, 37)6a) 71 (63, 78)
6b) 72 (65, 79)
70 (35, 93)53 (44, 61)59 (50, 69)
(7) Number of patients analysed17 (7, 32)35 (25, 45)18 (13, 24)7a) 78 (72, 85)
7b) 40 (32, 48)
NR84 (77, 90)74 (64, 82)
(8) Results for each adverse event39 (24, 56)8i) 0 (0, 4)
8ii) 28 (19, 38)
8a) 35 (28, 44)
8b) 68 (60, 76)
8c) 47 (39, 56)
8d) 19 (14, 27)
NR73 (65, 80)89 (82, 95)
(9) Subgroup AnalysisNRNR53 (43, 63)
(10) Balanced discussion5 (1, 17)10i) 61 (50, 71)
10ii) 14 (7, 23)
10iii) 44 (33, 55)
10a) 68 (60, 76)
10b) 61 (54, 70)
10c) 41 (34, 50)
NRNR83 (76, 91)
  • NR Not reported in manuscript, and no response from authors when contacted.

  • – Author detailed reasons for not reporting the recommendation.

  • 1) (i) Harm, safety or similar term used in title; (ii) Harm addressed in abstract.

  • 4) (i) When harm information was collected; (ii) Methods to attribute harm to intervention; (iii) Stopping rules.

  • 8) (i) Effect sizes for harms; (ii) Stratified serious and minor harms.

  • 10) (i) Interpret harm outcome; (ii) discuss generalizability; (iii) discuss current evidence.

  • 3) (a) Definition of AE; (b) All or selected sample; (c) Treatment Emergent AE; (d) Validated instrument; (e) Validated dictionary.

  • 4) (a) Mode of AE collection; (b) Timing of AE; (c) Details of attribution.

  • 5) (a) Details of presentation and analysis; (b) Handling of recurrent AE.

  • 6) (a) Early or late withdrawals; (b) Serious AEs or death.

  • 7) (a) Provide denominators for AEs; (b) Provide definitions used for analysis set.

  • 8) (a) Same analysis set used for efficacy and safety; (b) Results presented separately; (c) Severity and grading of AEs; (d) Provide both number of AEs and number of patients with AEs.

  • 10) (a) Discusses prior AE data; (b) Discussion is balanced; (c) Discusses limitations.