Doctor characteristics | N (%) |
---|---|
Sex* | |
Male | 266 (62) |
Female | 162 (38) |
Age (years)† | |
21–50 | 189 (47) |
51+ | 217 (53) |
Years in practice* | |
0–20 | 218 (50) |
21+ | 219 (50) |
Practice size* | |
Solo practice | 104 (24) |
Duo or group practice | 334 (76) |
Current job* | |
GP only | 306 (72) |
GP plus other‡ | 120 (28) |
Research experience* | |
No | 341 (78) |
Yes | 99 (22) |
First acquaintance with EBM* | |
Medical school or residency | 234 (53) |
After GP certification, while doing research | 208 (47) |
Priority given to EBM in own daily practice* | |
Low or moderate | 239 (55) |
High | 193 (45) |
Own EBM performance* | |
Poor or moderate | 253 (58) |
Excellent | 186 (42) |
EBM performance of GP colleagues* | |
Poor or moderate | 272 (62) |
Excellent | 164 (48) |
Decision-making style* | |
Strong intuition or mixed | 305 (70) |
Strong ratio | 128 (30) |
Preferred source§ for keeping up-to-date with evidence* | |
Oral reference | 139 (32) |
Written reference | 302 (68) |
Missing data.
*<5%.
†Between 5% and 10%.
‡Other, that is, registrar supervision, research, education, management.
§Oral reference, that is, colleagues, specialists, pharmaceutical reps or CME. Written reference, that is, internet, guidelines, handbooks or journals.
CPG, clinical practice guideline; EBM, evidence-based medicine; GP, general practitioner.