OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|
Unadjusted models | Adjusted models§ | |
A. Condom use | ||
Condom use during the last sex act | ||
With regular male partner | 1.50 (0.92 to 2.43) | 2.93 (1.70 to 5.06)** |
With paying male partner | 1.30 (0.69 to 2.35) | 2.82 (1.16 to 6.84)* |
With paid male/hijra partners | 3.59 (1.37 to 9.43)* | 7.73 (1.44 to 41.38)* |
With other non-commercial male/hijra partner | 2.96 (1.95 to 4.51)** | 4.07 (2.51 to 6.59)** |
Consistent condom use | ||
With regular male partner | 53.96 (32.15 to 90.58)** | 103.72 (44.13 to 243.78)** |
With paid male/hijra partners | 59.26 (24.81 to 141.49)** | 189.49 (41.44 to 866.58)** |
With other non-commercial male/hijra partner | 48.16 (27.13 to 85.50)* | 66.33 (34.59 to 127.20)** |
B. Sexually transmitted infections (including HIV) | ||
Syphilis¶ | 0.74 (0.42 to 1.30) | 0.56 (0.30 to 1.05) |
Syphilis titre≥1 : 8†† | 0.46 (0.24 to 0.87)* | 0.49 (0.22 to 1.09) |
Chlamydia infection | 1.56 (0.46 to 5.34) | 1.42 (0.38 to 5.39) |
Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection | 0.25 (0.05 to 1.25) | 0.30 (0.001 to 0.975)* |
HIV-1 infection | 1.14 (0.77 to 1.69) | 0.94 (0.58 to 1.52) |
*p<0.05.
**p<0.01.
†The estimates shown here are weighted estimates.
‡The reference for each of the estimate is Round 1 of the IBBA. Thus, for consistent condom use with a regular male partner the interpretation will be as follows: Subjects in Round 2 of IBBA were significantly more likely to report consistent condom use with a regular male partner compared with those in Round 1 of IBBA (OR 53.96, 95% CI 32.15 to 90.58).
§The models were adjusted for age, marital status, income, literacy, district of interview, local dweller, sexual identity, age of first sexual activity and sex outside the place of current residence.
¶Any person reactive on RPR and TPHA.
††The titre obtained on reactive RPR was used to measure this variable.
IBBA,integrated biological and behavioural assessment;RPR, Reactive Plasma Reagin; TPHA, Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay.