Table 2

Study quality—risk-of-bias assessment

StudySequence generationAllocation concealmentBlindingAdequate handling of incomplete outcome dataTotal drop out from drug assignmentNo selective reportingGroups comparable at baselineAdequate powerFunder
Dapagliflozin
Bailey et al8YesYesYes (double blind)Yes—last observation carried forward12%YesYesYes—0.5% HbA1c difference detectableAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Bolinder et al9/Ljunggren et al10YesYesYes (double blind)Yes—last observation carried forward7.1%YesYesUnclear for primary endpoint, 2% BMD difference detectableAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Nauck et al11YesYesYes (double blind and double dummy)Yes—last observation carried forward22.1%YesYesYes—0.35% HbA1c difference detectableAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Rosenstock et al12Not reportedNot reportedYes (double blind)Not reported8% at 24 weeks, 19% at 48 weeksYesUnclearNot reportedAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Strojek et al13YesYesYes (double blind and double dummy)Yes—last observation carried forward8.5%YesYesYes—0.5% HbA1c difference detectableAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Wilding et al14Not reportedNot reportedYes (single blind during lead in, double blind during study)Yes—last observation carried forward7%YesPartially; matched for patient demographics, not for prior medicationsYes—0.5% HbA1c difference detectableAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Wilding et al15YesYesYes (double blind and double dummy)Yes—last observation carried forward11% at 24 weeks, 15.5% at 48 weeksYesYesYes—0.5% HbA1c difference detectableAstra-Zeneca and Bristol-Myers-Squibb
Canagliflozin
Rosenstock et al16Not reportedNot reportedYes (double blind)Yes—last observation carried forward10.9%YesYesYes—0.55% HbA1c difference detectableJanssen Global Services
  • BMD, bone mineral density.