Table 1

Inter-rater reliability for Jadad Scale and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS): by question

Question—Jadad Scaleκ (95% CI)Question—NOS cohortκ (95% CI)Question—NOS case–controlκ (95% CI)
Randomisation0.50 (−1.00 to 1.00)Representativeness of exposed cohort−0.13 (−0.36 to 0.11)Case definition adequate1.00 (1.00 to 1.00)
Appropriate randomisation0.56 (0.29 to 0.83)Selection of non-exposed cohort−0.14 (−0.28 to 0.00)Cases representative−0.20 (−0.49 to 0.09)
Double blind0.41 (0.16 to 0.66)Exposure ascertainment0.00 (0.00 to 0.00)Control selection0.25 (−0.19 to 0.69)
Appropriate double blind0.17 (−0.07 to 0.41)Outcome not present at baseline0.20 (−0.33 to 0.73)Control definition0.14 (−0.54 to 0.82)
Description of withdrawals0.21 (−0.02 to 0.45)Comparability of cohorts0.12 (−0.23 to 0.47)Case and control comparability0.00 (0.00 to 0.00)
Description of inclusion/exclusion criteria0.27 (−0.03 to 0.57)Outcome assessment0.31 (−0.08 to 0.69)Exposure ascertainment−0.11 (−0.68 to 0.46)
Description of adverse effects0.13 (−0.11 to 0.37)Follow-up long enough−0.09 (−0.22 to 0.04)Same ascertainment method for cases and controls0.60 (−0.07 to 1.00)
Description of statistical analysis0.49 (0.21 to 0.77)Follow-up adequate0.39 (−0.02 to 0.81)Non-response rate−0.11 (−0.65 to 0.43)
  • κ, Kappa.