Gender | RP split | Gene | SNP | Genotypes | Full data | RP-subsetted data | |||
OR (95% CI) | p Value | Subset | OR (95% CI) | p Value | |||||
Male | Primary | ANKK1# | rs1800497 | T/T versus C/C + C/T | 2.55 (1.44 to 4.51) | 0.001* | – | – | – |
Left | GNRH1 | novel SNP | T/T versus C/C + T/C | 1.43 (1.09 to 1.88) | 0.011 | M1 | 1.57 (1.18 to 2.08) | 0.002* | |
Female | Primary | DRD2 | rs2242592 | C/C + T/C versus T/T | 1.32 (1.08 to 1.62) | 0.006* | – | – | – |
Left 1 | APOC3 | rs2854116 | T/T versus C/C + T/C | 1.28 (1.04 to 1.57) | 0.018 | F1 | 1.55 (1.15 to 2.09) | 0.004* | |
Left 2 | ACVR2B | rs3749386 | C/C + T/T versus T/C | 1.11 (0.91 to 1.36) | 0.302 | F2 | 2.17 (1.37 to 3.44) | 0.001* | |
Right 1 | FTO | rs1421085 | C/C + T/T versus T/C | 1.32 (1.08 to 1.62) | 0.007* | F3 | 1.65 (1.24 to 2.18) | 0.0005* | |
Right 2 | IL6 | rs1800795 | C/C + G/G versus C/G | 1.12 (0.92 to 1.37) | 0.269 | F4 | 1.85 (1.19 to 2.89) | 0.006* |
Each SNP split was first run on the full data set to represent single main factor effects (‘full data’) for both men and women. Then, the same SNP splits were run on specific subsets of data per RP tree splits (M1, F1–F4; ‘RP-subsetted data’).
M1: LR analysis was run for only those with genotype DRD2 rs1800497 C/C or C/T.
F1: LR analysis was run for only those with genotype DRD2 rs2242592 T/T.
F2: LR analysis was run for only those with genotypes DRD2 rs2242592 T/T and APOC3 rs2854116 T/T.
F3: LR analysis was run for only those with genotype DRD2 rs2242592 C/C or T/C.
F4: LR analysis was run for only those with genotypes DRD2 rs2242592 C/C or T/C and FTO rs1421085 T/C.
#rs1800497 is historically known as the DRD2 Taq1A allele.
↵* p<0.009
LR, logistic regression; RP, recursive partitioning; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.