Multivariate | ||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
Predisposing variables | Plus enabling variables | Plus need variables | ||||
Block statistics | χ2=22.38 | χ2=16.79 | χ2=107.09 | |||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Predisposing factors | ||||||
Child gender | ||||||
Boys | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
Girls | 0.93 | 0.73 to 1.19 | 0.93 | 0.73 to 1.19 | 0.98 | 0.75 to 1.27 |
Child ethnic background | ||||||
Dutch | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
Other western | 1.73* | 1.10 to 2.71 | 1.66* | 1.05 to 2.60 | 1.66* | 1.02 to 2.68 |
Non-western | 1.51* | 1.05 to 2.18 | 1.20 | 0.81 to 1.78 | 1.18 | 0.77 to 1.79 |
Parental age in year | ||||||
≥40 | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
30–39 | 1.56 | 0.99 to 2.46 | 1.57 | 1.00 to 2.46 | 1.45 | 0.90 to 2.32 |
≤29 | 2.28** | 1.38 to 3.77 | 1.96* | 1.17 to 3.27 | 1.71* | 1.01 to 2.92 |
Enabling factors | ||||||
Parental educational level | ||||||
High | Ref | Ref | ||||
Middle | 1.36* | 1.04 to 1.79 | 1.30 | 0.97 to 1.74 | ||
Low | 1.12 | 0.67 to 1.89 | 1.10 | 0.63 to 1.90 | ||
Parental work status | ||||||
Employed | Ref | Ref | ||||
Unemployed | 1.47* | 1.07 to 2.02 | 1.28 | 0.91 to 1.80 | ||
Family composition | ||||||
Two-parent family | Ref | Ref | ||||
Single-parent family | 1.51 | 0.95 to 2.41 | 1.31 | 0.80 to 2.15 | ||
Need factors | ||||||
BITSEA Problem scale score | ||||||
No risk | Ref | |||||
At risk | 1.20 | 0.72 to 1.99 | ||||
BITSEA Competence scale score | ||||||
No risk | Ref | |||||
At risk | 1.18 | 0.78 to 1.79 | ||||
Stressful life events | ||||||
No | Ref | |||||
Yes | 1.29 | 0.98 to 1.68 | ||||
General health of the child* | ||||||
Good | Ref | |||||
Poor | 1.16 | 0.73 to 1.85 | ||||
Parental satisfaction of child’s development† | ||||||
Yes | Ref | |||||
No | 1.35 | 0.75 to 2.45 | ||||
Previous help-seeking | ||||||
No | Ref | |||||
Yes | 2.52*** | 1.83 to 3.48 | ||||
Discussion of child socio-emotional development in the well-child visit | ||||||
No | Ref | |||||
Yes | 2.47*** | 1.73 to 3.53 |
Model 1: The model with predisposing factors as independent variables.
Model 2: The model with predisposing and enabling factors as independent variables.
Model 3: The full model with predisposing, enabling, and need factors as independent variables.
*p <0.05; **p <0.01; ***p <0.001.
*General health of the child was measured by the 4-item subscale General Health of the Infant Toddler Quality of Life Questionnaire (47 items).
†Parental satisfaction of child’s development was measured by the 5-item subscale Satisfaction of Child’s Development of the Infant Toddler Quality of Life Questionnaire (47 items).
BITSEA, Brief Infant–Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment; χ2, model chi-square for each block of variables, all significant at p<0.05.