Aspects considered important for an implementation of PROM-collecting instruments into the daily clinical routine
| Variable | n=1212 |
| User-friendliness (for hospital staff and patients), n (%) | 986 |
| Very important | 605 (61.4) |
| Important | 333 (33.8) |
| Neither important nor unimportant | 42 (4.3) |
| Unimportant | 4 (0.4) |
| Very unimportant | 2 (0.2) |
| Costs (acquisition and maintenance), n (%) | 985 |
| Very important | 389 (39.5) |
| Important | 459 (46.6) |
| Neither important nor unimportant | 115 (11.7) |
| Unimportant | 20 (2.0) |
| Very unimportant | 2 (0.2) |
| Time efficiency, n (%) | 976 |
| Very important | 543 (55.6) |
| Important | 370 (37.9) |
| Neither important nor unimportant | 56 (5.7) |
| Unimportant | 4 (0.4) |
| Very unimportant | 3 (0.3) |
| Compatibility to existing software tools in my hospital (eg, electronic medical records), n (%) | 984 |
| Very important | 449 (45.6) |
| Important | 400 (40.7) |
| Neither important nor unimportant | 110 (11.2) |
| Unimportant | 20 (2.0) |
| Very unimportant | 5 (0.5) |
| Interpretation and clinical relevance of results, n (%) | 986 |
| Very important | 529 (53.7) |
| Important | 404 (41.0) |
| Neither important nor unimportant | 47 (4.8) |
| Unimportant | 4 (0.4) |
| Very unimportant | 2 (0.2) |
PROM, patient-reported outcome measure.