Table 3

Final analytical themes and their definitions

Final analytical themes with subthemesDefinitionStakeholder group, study
ChildrenMothersProfessionals
1. Precursors for acceptable identification and response
 1.1. Satisfying and sustainable relationshipPatients know and trust professionals with whom they develop good long-term relationships. Trusting relationships enable patients to feel safe and comfortable to discuss sensitive issues. 45 32 44–46 37 41 46
 1.2. Desired professional attitudes and skillsWhen interacting with patients/clients, professionals demonstrate non-judgemental, non-threatening attitudes, show respect, actively listen, validate patient’s accounts, reassure confidentiality and provide practical help. 35 45 32 35 42 44–46 37 41 42
 1.3. Considering mother’s readinessProfessionals acknowledge individual mothers’ readiness to disclose IPV and engage with services, work towards increasing mothers’ readiness and match their approaches to the stage of mothers’ readiness. 43 44 35 41 46
 1.4. Patient materialsCulturally sensitive materials on IPV and children’s exposure to IPV in different languages are displayed in healthcare settings. 43 41
 1.5. Professional trainingProfessionals receive adequate training on communication with children, indicators of children’s exposure to IPV, especially psychological and non-direct physical IPV, professionals’ role in identifying and responding, documenting and reporting, interagency work. 35 45 32 35 43–46 35–37 41 42
 1.6. Professional resourcesProfessionals have clear guidance on local IPV resources, what constitutes children’s exposure to IPV, what is reportable and how to document children’s exposure to IPV in a way that keeps the child safe and ensures the safety and confidentiality of the mother. 37 41 42
 1.7. Professional supervision and supportProfessionals have skilled supervision and ongoing support for coping with psychological consequences of working with children and mothers exposed to IPV and preventing vicarious trauma 35 37 41 47
 1.8. Addressing systems’ barriersProfessionals’ work of identifying and responding to children’s exposure to IPV fits into the organisational, local and national context of increased demands on healthcare and social services without commensurate resources. 35 37 40 41
2. Acceptable identification
 2.1. Space and timeIt is ideal to give patients permission, space and time to discuss sensitive matters. 45 45
 2.2. VocabularyIt is preferable for HCPs to phrase questions about children’s exposure to IPV as a ‘safety-at-home’ matter. 45 45
 2.2. Phased approachWhen asking about children’s exposure to IPV, it is ideal for HCPs to initiate the enquiry, adapt it to the context of the consultation and use a phased approach—from presenting symptoms to general safety and well-being, then to safety at home. 45 45 37 41 42 47
3. Acceptable initial response
 3.1. Shifting focusProfessionals first focus their responses on the mother-child dyad and shift to the child if he/she is at risk of harm. Professionals need assistance with managing emotional burdens caused by the shift. 35 37 41
 3.2. Emotional supportWhen responding to disclosure, it is ideal to provide children and parents with encouragement and emotional support. 46 37 39 47
 3.3. EducationIt is acceptable to educate mothers about the impact of IPV on children, IPV dynamics, professionals’ roles and duties in responding. However, education should not jeopardise patient safety (eg, through sending materials home where the perpetrator can find them). 43 35 37 41 42 46
 3.4. SignpostingIt is acceptable for professionals to give children and mothers information about local IPV services. 35 35 35 37 46
4. Conflicting perspectives on engagement with children and management of safety
 4.1. Engaging directly with childrenStakeholders’ perspectives on the acceptability of talking directly to children exposed to IPV and seeing them alone are conflicting. Children are absent in the patient-professional communication. Mothers and children want direct engagement with children. Professionals do not see children as patients on their own and feel ill-equipped for communicating with children about IPV. 34 35 45 45 35 37 40
 4.2. Management of safetyStakeholder preferences regarding risk assessment and safety planning are conflicting. Mothers and children are absent in the management of safety and want to be involved. Professionals are not satisfied with current risk assessment and safety planning approaches and want them to change. 45 46 35 37 40 41
  • IPV, intimate partner violence; HCPs, healthcare professionals; SSPs,  social care professionals.