Table 3

Type of PPI explicitly reported before and after the introduction of a mandatory reporting policy

Involvement typeNo. (%)
Before (n=1)After (n=16)
Study design
 Contributions to the grant application and or study protocol0/1 (0)3/16 (19)
 Help to set the research question or commenting on its importance0/1 (0)4/16 (25)
 Ensuring the development of, or choice of, outcome measures were informed by patients’ priorities, experience and preferences0/1 (0)7/16 (44)
 Patient assessment of the burden of the intervention before the study commenced or involvement in designing the intervention (where applicable)*1/1 (100)4/9 (44)
Study conduct
 Involved in the study steering group or a member of the research team1/1 (100)6/16 (38)
 Recruitment and/or implementation of the research0/1 (0)8/16 (50)
 Patient/public communication materials for example, patient information sheets0/1 (0)4/16 (25)
Analysis
 Contributed to data analysis0/1 (0)1/16 (6)
 Interpretation of study findings0/1 (0)2/16 (13)
Drafting of the manuscript
 Contributions to editing, revising and or writing the manuscript1/1 (100)3/16 (19)
 Patients listed as coauthors1/1 (100)1/16 (6)
Dissemination
 Direct involvement of patients led by the research team including the development of materials for dissemination and choosing the most appropriate method of dissemination0/1 (0)3/16 (19)
 Indirect involvement through dissemination to patient charities, organisations and groups that may, in turn, involve patients in the process0/1 (0)3/16 (19)
 Patient representation informing the content of dissemination materials on a general advisory board for the use of the data used in research0/1 (0)3/16 (19)†
  • *The denominator only includes studies where there was an intervention that is, excludes systematic reviews, population based studies, secondary analyses and so on.

  • †This includes three papers from the QResearch team with identical statements about some aspects of PI in dissemination, but this PPI was specific to the QResearch database, not the individual published studies and it is not clear how much patients were involved in the individual studies reported.

  • Responses are not mutually exclusive. For example, if a patient  was on the steering group, this will be indicated in the relevant box and in the box about implementation of the research. However, not all those involved in study conduct were made members of steering groups.

  • PPI, patient and public involvement.