Table 3

Descriptive overview of the categories in all the cases; percentage comparison refers to the proportion of participants who mentioned that category in reply to the characteristic of the case vignette scenarios

Case vignette scenario
OverallOutcomeWitnessCause of error
Not negativeNegativeNo witnessWitnessSelf causes errorColleague causes error
Categories considering communication
Excuse to the patient 32 (20%)9 (14%)23 (24%)11 (18%)16 (27%)27 (22%)5 (14%)
Disclosure of an error to the patient 47 (30%)14 (22%)33 (35%)13 (21%)24 (40%)37 (30%)10 (27%)
Considering disclosure 16 (10%)6 (9%)10 (11%)7 (11%)8 (13%)15 (12%)1 (3%)
Considering no disclosure 16 (10%)10 (16%)6 (6%)5 (8%)8 (13%)13 (11%)3 (8%)
Concealment 9 (6%)6 (9%)3 (3%)8 (13%)0 (0%)8 (7%)1 (3%)
Communication with colleagues 45 (28%)18 (28%)27 (29%)2 (3%)14 (23%)16 (13%)29 (78%)
Communication with nursing staff 1 (1%)1 (2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (2%)1 (1%)0 (0%)
Communication with the superior/chief 46 (29%)14 (22%)32 (34%)20 (32%)15 (25%)35 (29%)11 (30%)
Communication with others 15 (9%)3 (5%)12 (13%)4 (6%)7 (12%)11 (9%)4 (11%)
Categories considering reporting
Reporting in general 20 (13%)5 (8%)15 (16%)7 (11%)6 (10%)13 (11%)7 (19%)
Reporting to an incident reporting system 5 (3%)2 (3%)3 (3%)2 (3%)3 (5%)5 (4%)0 (0%)
Categories considering consequences
Actions resulting from the error 42 (27%)13 (20%)29 (31%)18 (29%)14 (23%)32 (26%)10 (27%)
Consequences in general/prevention 17 (11%)12 (19%)5 (5%)7 (11%)4 (7%)11 (9%)6 (16%)
Personal learning 5 (3%)5 (8%)0 (0%)2 (3%)2 (3%)4 (3%)1 (3%)
Cause analysis 15 (9%)10 (16%)5 (5%)6 (10%)6 (10%)12 (10%)3 (8%)
Legal aspects/documentation 9 (6%)3 (5%)6 (6%)3 (5%)4 (7%)7 (6%)2 (5%)
Categories considering emotional responsiveness
Meaning for the patient/patient’s perspective 27 (17%)15 (23%)12 (13%)7 (11%)13 (22%)20 (16%)7 (19%)
Being emotionally touched 8 (5%)4 (6%)4 (4%)3 (5%)4 (7%)7 (6%)1 (3%)
Guilt 7 (4%)2 (3%)5 (5%)2 (3%)5 (8%)7 (6%)0 (0%)
Uncertainty/doubts 24 (15%)9 (14%)15 (16%)15 (24%)6 (10%)21 (17%)3 (8%)