Table 2

Summary of GRADE evidence profile of antibiotics vs placebo or standard care

Outcome/timeframeStudy results and measurementsAbsolute effect estimatesCertainty in effect estimates (quality of evidence)Plain text summary
No antibioticsAntibiotics
Treatment failure/1 monthOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.90)
Based on data from 2517 patients in eight studies
Follow-up 7–21 days
93
per 1000
56
per 1000
Low
Due to serious risk of bias and serious inconsistency*
Antibiotics probably reduce the risk of treatment failure.
Difference: 37 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 56 fewer—9 fewer)
Treatment failure (antibiotics with activity against MRSA)/1 monthOR 0.45 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.62)
Based on data from 2305 patients in six studies
Follow-up 7–21 days
128
per 1000
62
per 1000
HighAntibiotics with activity against MRSA reduce the risk of treatment failure.
Difference: 66 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 82 fewer—45 fewer)
Treatment failure (antibiotics without activity against MRSA)/1 monthOR 1.82 (95% CI 0.68 to 4.85)
Based on data from 212 patients in two studies
Follow-up 7–21 days
58
per 1000
101
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision†
Antibiotics without activity against MRSA may not reduce the risk of treatment failure.
Difference: 43 more per 1000
(95% CI 18 fewer—172 more)
Recurrence within/1 monthOR 0.48 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.77)
Based on data from 2134 patients in six studies
Follow-up 7–30 days
129
per 1000
66
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious risk of bias and borderline inconsistency‡
Antibiotics probably reduce the risk of early abscess recurrence.
Difference: 63 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 86 fewer—27 fewer)
Late recurrence/1−3 monthsOR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.85)
Based on data from 1111 patients in two studies
Follow-up 63–90 days
267
per 1000
189
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious risk of bias, borderline imprecision§
Antibiotics probably reduce the risk of late abscess recurrence.
Difference: 78 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 118 fewer—31 fewer)
Hospitalisation/3 monthsOR 0.55 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.94)
Based on data from 1206 patients in two studies
Follow-up 40–90 days
39
per 1000
22
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision¶
Antibiotics probably reduce the risk of hospitalisation.
Difference: 17 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 26 fewer—2 fewer)
Pain (tenderness)/(3–4 days)OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.97)
Based on data from 1057 patients in one study
Follow-up 3–4 days
559
per 1000
491
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision**
Antibiotics probably increase the risk of pain at 3–4 days.
Difference: 68 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 126 fewer—8 fewer)
Pain (tenderness)/(8–10 days)OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.88)
Based on data from 1057 patients in one study
Follow-up 8–10 days
101
per 1000
59
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision††
Antibiotics may not increase the risk of pain at 8–10 days.
Difference: 42 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 63 fewer—11 fewer)
Additional surgical procedures within/1–3 monthsOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.87)
Based on data from 1013 patients in one study
Follow-up 43–63 days
136
per 1000
84
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision‡‡
Antibiotics probably increase the risk of additional surgical procedures.
Difference: 52 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 78 fewer—16 fewer)
Infections in family members within/1 monthOR 0.58 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.01)
Based on data from 1013 patients in one study
Follow-up 7–14 days
67
per 1000
40
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision§§
Antibiotics probably do not increase the risk of infection in family members.
Difference: 27 fewer per 1000
(95% CI 43 fewer—1 more)
Invasive infections/1 monthOR 1.02 (95% CI 0.14 to 7.24)
Based on data from 1057 patients in one study
Follow-up 7–14 days
4
per 1000
4
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision¶¶
Antibiotics probably do not reduce the risk of serious complications at 7–14 days.
Difference: 0 more per 1000
(95% CI 3 fewer—24 more)
Invasive infections/3 monthsOR 7.46 (95% CI 0.15 to 376.12)
Based on data from 1013 patients in one study
Follow-up 42–56 days
0
per 1000
1
per 1000
Moderate
Due to serious imprecision***
Antibiotics probably do not reduce the risk of serious complications at 42–56 days.
Difference: 2 more per 1000
(95% CI 4 fewer—8more)
  • Evidence have summarised at Magic App (www.magicapp.org/public/guideline/jlRvQn).

  • *Risk of bias: serious. There was substantial missing data/lost to follow-up: the results are not robust to worth plausible sensitivity analysis (assuming that missing patients from the control arms have the same rate of treatment failure as those with complete follow-up, and five times the rate of treatment failure in the patients who were lost to follow-up in the antibiotic arm); inconsistency: serious. Effects might differ in different type of antibiotics.

  • †Imprecision: serious. CI approaches no effect.

  • ‡Risk of bias: serious. There was substantial missing data/lost to follow-up: the results are not robust to worth plausible sensitivity analysis; inconsistency: no serious. The magnitude of statistical heterogeneity was high, with I2=45%, but the direction of effect was similar in almost all trials, favouring antibiotics over no antibiotics.

  • §Risk of bias: serious. Incomplete data and/or large loss to follow-up: results are not sensitive to worst plausible sensitivity analysis: OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.55 to 3.96; imprecision: no serious. A single large study, and one small study contributed data to this outcome.

  • ¶Imprecision: serious. CI approaches no effect.

  • **Imprecision: serious. Only data from one study, CI approaches no effect.

  • ††Imprecision: serious. Only data from one study.

  • ‡‡Imprecision: serious. Data from one study only.

  • §§Imprecision: serious. Only data from one study; CI include no effect.

  • ¶¶Imprecision: serious. Only data from one study.

  • ***Imprecision: serious. Only data from one study; CI include no effect.

  • GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.