Table 1

The capacity of computer-assisted self-administered interviewing (CASI) to correctly classify menarcheal status using face-to-face interviewing (FFI) as a reference

Age at investigation M (SD)(years)Menarche attainment n (%)Time since menarche M (SD) (years)SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPVAccuracy
FFICASI
 Total (n = 3478)*14.3 (2.46)2538 (73.0)2496 (71.2)2.81 (1.75)0.970.800.990.960.92
Location
 Urban (n=1863)14.3 (2.51)1389 (74.6)1364 (73.2)2.96 (1.80)0.970.880.990.960.95
 Rural (n=1615)14.3 (2.40)1149 (71.2)1132 (70.1)2.63 (1.68)0.970.710.990.970.90
Grades
 G5 (n=496)10.9 (0.66)52 (10.5)53 (10.7)0.65 (0.71)0.770.730.750.980.73
 G6 (n=484)12.0 (0.60)182 (37.6)176 (36.4)0.80 (0.57)0.910.830.940.970.86
 G7 (n=507)13.0 (0.63)364 (71.8)354 (69.8)1.22 (0.79)0.950.900.980.960.94
 G8 (n=440)14.0 (0.68)404 (91.8)394 (89.6)1.74 (0.86)0.970.920.990.920.97
 G9 (n=429)15.1 (0.69)419 (97.7)411 (95.8)2.58 (1.03)0.980.901.000.900.98
 G10 (n=388)16.1 (0.73)38 4 (99.0)383 (98.7)3.23 (1.09)0.990.500.990.500.99
 G11 (n=346)17.1 (0.71)346 (100.0)342 (98.8)4.02 (1.16)0.99
 G12 (n=388)18.3 (0.71)387 (99.7)383 (98.7)5.18 (1.34)0.991.001.000.250.99
Awareness in reproductive health
 <25% (n=838)13.0 (1.86)481 (57.4)445 (53.1)1.84 (1.23)0.910.710.980.960.82
 25%–50% (n=1552)14.2 (2.48)1130 (72.8)1127 (72.6)2.73 (1.70)0.980.820.980.960.93
 >50% (n=1088)15.3 (2.44)927 (85.2)924 (84.9)3.36 (1.80)0.990.931.000.960.98
Tanner breast stage
 B1 (n=223)11.1 (0.79)2 (0.90)9 (4.04)0.61 (0.48)1.000.770.221.000.78
 B2 (n=364)11.6 (0.94)59 (16.2)63 (17.31)0.84 (0.50)0.920.770.860.990.80
 B3 (n=818)12.7 (1.33)472 (57.7)452 (55.3)1.28 (0.92)0.930.840.970.940.89
 B4 (n=976)14.5 (1.62)910 (93.2)889 (91.1)2.29 (1.28)0.970.800.990.920.96
 B5 (n=1095)16.9 (1.54)1093 (99.8)1081 (98.7)3.95 (1.62)0.990.501.000.140.98
  • *203 out of the 3478 girls (5.84%) were unclear about their status of menarche by CASI.

  • M, mean; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.