Profile membership (N=35 818) | Distribution within profile (%) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
Profile 1 (58.1%): Overall high social–emotional functioning (n=20 819) | ||
Receiving subsidy | 16.4 | Ref |
Boy | 43.3 | Ref |
ESL | 15.3 | Ref |
Subsidy×boy | Ref | |
Subsidy×ESL | Ref | |
Boy×ESL | Ref | |
Profile 2 (8.8%): inhibited-adaptive (n=3142) | ||
Receiving subsidy | 20.8 | 1.33 (1.15 to 1.53)*** |
Boy | 43.5 | 1.00 (0.91 to 1.11) |
ESL | 22.5 | 1.80 (1.57 to 2.07)*** |
Subsidy×boy | 1.06 (0.86 to 1.29) | |
Subsidy×ESL | 0.76 (0.61 to 0.96)* | |
Boy×ESL | 0.94 (0.77 to 1.14) | |
Profile 3 (17.1%): uninhibited-adaptive (n=6120) | ||
Receiving subsidy | 21.4 | 1.63 (1.44 to 1.85)*** |
Boy | 64.9 | 2.52 (2.34 to 2.72)*** |
ESL | 18.6 | 1.39 (1.21 to 1.60)*** |
Subsidy×boy | 0.89 (0.76 to 1.04) | |
Subsidy×ESL | 0.64 (0.53 to 0.78)*** | |
Boy×ESL | 1.03 (0.87 to 1.22) | |
Profile 4 (7.3%): inhibited-disengaged (n=2620) | ||
Receiving subsidy | 27.3 | 2.13 (1.80 to 2.53)*** |
Boy | 62.4 | 2.44 (2.17 to 2.75)*** |
ESL | 24.1 | 2.18 (1.82 to 2.61)*** |
Subsidy×boy | 0.93 (0.76 to 1.15) | |
Subsidy×ESL | 0.67 (0.53 to 0.85)** | |
Boy×ESL | 0.83 (0.67 to 1.03) | |
Profile 5 (6.2%): uninhibited-aggressive/hyperactive (n=2207) | ||
Receiving subsidy | 28.5 | 2.68 (2.14 to 3.36)*** |
Boy | 78.9 | 5.19 (4.47 to 6.03)*** |
ESL | 17.4 | 1.36 (1.02 to 1.82)* |
Subsidy×boy | 0.89 (0.69 to 1.15) | |
Subsidy×ESL | 0.42 (0.31 to 0.55)*** | |
Boy×ESL | 1.15 (0.84 to 1.57) | |
Profile 6 (2.5%): overall low social–emotional functioning (n=910) | ||
Receiving subsidy | 37.1 | 4.54 (3.32 to 6.20)*** |
Boy | 76.9 | 4.50 (3.53 to 5.74)*** |
ESL | 19.4 | 1.44 (0.92 to 2.24) |
Subsidy×boy | 0.79 (0.55 to 1.13) | |
Subsidy×ESL | 0.32 (0.22 to 0.48)*** | |
Boy×ESL | 1.43 (0.89 to 2.30) |
ORs can be interpreted as the odds of membership to each more vulnerable social–emotional profile group compared with a group with overall high social–emotional functioning. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
ESL, English as a second language.