Table 1

Data extraction of studies included in systematic review

Study & year publishedCountryDesignMethod and DescriptionNumber of articipants & Ethnic GroupAge descriptionDuration of StudyKey Outcomes
Papers assessing T1DM comorbidities
Brabarupan et al 12 (2013)UKCross-sectional study Ethnicity
Grouped into WE, African and SA
T1DM
Diagnosis of T1DM and diagnosed <35 years of age
Method
Data from patients from WE, African or SA ancestry were obtained from an electronic database in a large multiethnic London diabetes clinic
642 individuals in total
WE: 564
SA: 39
African: 39
Median age at diagnosis (years)
WE: 16.7
African: 19.4
SA: 19.1
N/AParameters median (IQR)
BMI (kg/m2)
Systolic BP (mm Hg)
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)
HbA1c (%)
Microalbuminuria (mg/mmol)
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
HDL (mmol/L)
Triglyceride (mmol/L)
WE
25.0 (22.3–27.7)
130 (119–141)
75 (69–81)
8.0 (7.1–8.9)
1.2 (−0.5–3.0)
4.50 (3.90–5.10)
1.49 (1.21–1.77)
0.93 (0.59–1.28)
African
25.7 (22.5–28.9)
135 (121–149)
80 (72–88)
9.1 (7.6–10.7)
3.7 (−44.5–51.9)
4.40 (3.90–4.90)
1.25 (0.95–1.56)
0.99 (0.58)
SA
25.3 (22.2–28.5)
122 (1120133)
73 (67–79)
8.3 (7.5–9.2)
1.2 (−1.4–3.8)
4.00 (3.2–4.8)
1.30 (1.47–1.14)
1.07 (0.76–1.39)
Significant
p<0.05
p<0.05
p<0.05
p<0.05
p<0.05
p<0.05
Sarwar et al 9 (2015)UKCross-sectional study Ethnicity
SA and WE
T1DM
Coding of T1DM from the clinical database of two centres—no diagnostic criteria included
Method
Data analysed from two centres in the West Midlands (QEH and NCH)
WE: 278
SA: 139
Median age (years)
NCH WE: 34
NCH SA: 33.5
QEH WE: 36
QEH SA: 36
N/A Characteristic (no of patients)
HbA1c (mmol/mol)
Systolic BP (mm Hg)
Diastolic BP (mm Hg)
BMI (kg/m2)
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)
HDL (mmol/L)
Cholesterol/HDL
Creatinine level (µmol/L)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
Albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/mmol)
NCH South Asian (80)
75 (61.5–88.5)
121 (113–132)

25.6 (22.55–28.4)
4.7 (3.9–5.45)
1.3 (1.0–1.6)*
3.6 (2.9–4.5)*
75 (66–87)
97.3 (82.2–109.9)
2.4 (0.7–3.6)
NCH Caucasian (160)
76 (63–91)
125 (115–132)

25.7 (22.5–30.4)
4.6 (4–5.3)
1.4 (1.2–1.65)*
3.2 (2.7–4.0)*
78 (69–87)
91.2 (79.3–103.9)
2.5 (0.75–3.5)
QEH South Asian (59)
66.1 (55.25–81.75)
130 (120.5–141.5)
86 (80.5–90)*
30.9 (22.8–37)
4.45 (3.8–5.45)




QEH Caucasian (118)
70.5 (61–83.6)
131.5 (120.3–144)
82 (77.25–88.75)*
25 (22.6–28)
4.1 (3.7–4.95)

-
-

Shenoy et al 10 (2004)UKRetrospective observational study Ethnicity
SA and WE
T1DM
Children coded as T1DM in a centre in Leicestershire—no diagnostic criteria included
Method
Rates of obesity/overweight in WE and SA groups and to correlate these with age, duration of diagnosis, daily insulin requirement and HbA1c
Included children between the ages of 2 and 18 years and who had been diagnosed more than a year ago
WE: 112
SA: 38
Age group (n)
2–4 years (3)
5–9 years (33)
10–15 years (90)
16–18 years (24)
N/A Demographic data
No statistically significant difference in the two subgroups in relation to age, duration of diagnosis, daily insulin requirement and metabolic control (median HbA1c 8.4% vs 8.8%, respectively, for white Caucasian/SA)
Obesity in children
No statistically significant differences noted in the rates of overweight or obesity between white Caucasian and SA children at any age grouping.
Asmal et al 16 (1981)South AfricaCross-sectional analysis Ethnicity
Two groups: Indians and Black African
T1DM
Clinic patients who fulfilled the following criteria: age of diagnosis of diabetes <35 years, development of symptoms with/without ketosis in the absence of insulin therapy and duration of diabetes of at least 12 months
Method
Case records examined, clinical assessments and biochemical tests carried out
Black African: 52
Indians: 38
Mean age at onset (years)
Blacks: 21.8
Indians: 18.0
4 weeks Basic biochemical data
Glucose (mmol/L)
Growth hormone (ng/mL)
Cortisol (µg/dL)
Cholesterol (mmol/L)
Triglyceride (mmol/L)
Creatinine (µg/dL)
Complications
Chronic complications associated with microangiopathy were detected in 12 Indians (33%) and 2 blacks (4%). The most common complication was neuropathy found in 19% of Indians with diabetesand in 4% of blacks with diabetes. Two Indians had evidence of diabetic triopathy.
Indians
15.80±1.50
3.00±0.76
16.20±1.47
5.17±0.32
2.81±0.97
68.90±4.10
Black African
14.20±1.50
1.76±0.41
15.80±1.40
4.78±0.26
2.27±0.83
79.40±6.70
Ismail et al 14 (2001)MalaysiaCross-sectional study Ethnicity
Three groups: Indians, Malay and Chinese
Each ethnic group identified by appearance, language and religion
T1DM
T1DM defined as acute symptoms associated with heavy ketonuria (>3+) or ketoacidosis at diagnosis, or continuous treatment with insulin within 1 year of diagnosis
Method
Patients recruited from seven centres throughout Peninsular Malaysia
Blood taken for lipid levels, clinical history and physical examination performed
Indians: 154
Malay: 297
Chinese: 128
Mean age (years)
All: 28.8
Indians: 29.1
Chinese: 29.8
Malay: 27.7
June 1997– June 1998 Demographic features
BMI (kg/m2)
Waist–hip ratio
HbA1c (%)
Lipid profiles (mmol/L, mean ± SEM)
Total cholesterol: Indians (5.74±1.25), Chinese (5.64±1.42), Malay (5.58±1.38)
LDL cholesterol: Indians (3.89±1.20), Chinese (3.52±1.22), Malay (3.48±1.12)
HDL cholesterol (mean (95% CI)): Indians (1.28 (1.19 to 1.38)), Chinese (1.57 (1.48 to 1.67)), Malay (1.37 (1.28 to 1.46))
Triglycerides (mean (95% C)): Indians (1.02 (0.9 to 1.16)), Chinese (0.82 (0.74 to 0.91)), Malay (1.11 (0.99 to 1.23))
Malay (n=297)
26.8±4.9
All: 0.88±0.06
Male: 0.91±0.06
Female: 0.86±0.06
8.8 (8.6–9.1)
Chinese (n=128)
25.4±4.5
All: 0.88±0.07
Male: 0.90±0.06
Female: 0.85±0.07
8.0 (7.7–8.3)
Indians (n=154)
25.5±4.3
All: 0.89±0.06
Male: 0.93±0.06
Female: 0.85±0.06
8.5 (8.2–8.8)
Omar et al 13 (1984)South AfricaCross-sectional analysis Ethnicity
Indians and Africans
T1DM
Classification of diabetes based on criteria by National Diabetes Data Group and WHO Expert Committee
Patients with T1DM had always depended on insulin for control of symptoms and prevention of basal ketosis.
All patients diagnosed <35 years of age
African T1DM: 86
Indian T1DM: 40
Mean age of onset (range)
African: 23.5 (1–35) years
Indians: 17 (1-35)
2-year period Clinical characteristics of patients with T1DM
Characteristic
Male: female
Mean % ideal body weight
Mean duration of disease (years)
Mean age of onset
African (n=86)
21: 25
106 (68–153)
3.8 (1–27)
23.5 (1–35)
Indians (n=40)
17: 24
91 (71–136)
5.4 (1–22)
17 (1–35)
Papers assessing T1DM complications
Swerdlow et al 19 (2004)UKProspective cohort study Ethnicity
Grouped into SA and non-SA
SA identified by computer algorithm (SANGRA) followed by a clerical check by an individual with expertise in this area
T1DM
Patients with IDDM diagnosed <30 years
Method
SMRs calculated, comparing mortality in the cohort to the corresponding mortality rates in the general population
Non-SA: 23, 326
SA:
424
N/A1972–
1999
Mortality
The SMRs for SA patients diagnosed <30 years were 3.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 6.9) in men and 10.1 (95% CI 5.6 to 16.6) in women and in the corresponding non-SA were 2.7 (95% CI 2.6 to 2.9) in men and 4.0 (95% CI 3.6 to 4.3) in women.
Mehta et al 11 (2011)UKCross-sectional study Ethnicity
Ethnicity was categorised as SA or WE based on patient record documentation or by analysis of their name using a validated name recognition software ‘Nam Pechan’ supplemented by a visual inspection of surnames and forenames
T1DM
Patient coded as having T1DM in the clinical database of a specialist outpatient diabetes clinic in Leicestershire, UK—no diagnostic criteria included
Method
Patient characteristics and other data were extracted from the clinical workstation, a clinical database of patients attending a specialist outpatient diabetes clinic in Leicestershire
WE: 1169
SA: 163
Mean age (years)
WE: 45.3
SA: 41.9
2003–
2005
No of comorbidities (n (%))
0
1
≥2
Macrovascular (n (%))
CVD
Ischaemic heart disease
Peripheral vascular disease
Cerebrovascular disease
TIA
Microvascular (n (%))
Retinopathy
Neuropathy
Nephropathy
Glycaemic control (n (%))
HbA1C <7%
HbA1C ≥7%
SA (N=163)
114 (69.9)
36 (22.1)
13 (8.0)
25 (15.3)
20 (12.3)
3 (1.8)
6 (3.7)
0
63 (38.7)
24 (14.7)
22 (13.5)
(N=163)
19 (12.0)
144 (88.0)
WE (N=1169)
878 (75.1)
235 (20.1)
56 (4.8)
132 (11.3)
97 (8.3)
31 (2.7)
21 (1.8)
2 (0.2)
561 (48.0)
325 (27.8)
118 (10.1)
(N=1169)
193 (17.0)
976 (83.0)
p Value
0.166
0.133
0.093
0.790
0.130
1.000
0.025
<0.001
0.184
0.113
Sivaprasad et al 18 (2012)UKCross-sectional study Ethnicity
Self-reported ethnicity based on UK census standard (Census 2001): categorised as ‘White European’, ‘African', ‘South Asian’, ‘Mixed’, ‘other ethnic group’ and ‘not known’
T1DM
Patients coded as T1DM in the database of the local DR screening service—no diagnostic criteria included
Method
To assess ethnic variations of the prevalence of DR and visual impairment in two multiracial cohorts in the UK (Yorkshire and South East London)
WE: 2628
African: 344
SA: 120
Mean age of T1DM population:
39.4 years
2008–
2009
Ethnic group
Any diabetic retinopathy
WE
African
South Asian
Any maculopathy (M1)
WE
African
SA
CSMO (M1P1)
WE
African
SA
STDR (R2 or R3 or M1P1)
WE
African
SA
Prevalence: n (%)
1446 (55.0)
154 (44.8)
64 (53.3)
371 (14.1)
47 (13.7)
171 (6.5)
17 (14.2)
35 (10.20
12 (10.0)
318 (12.1)
53 (15.4)
19 (15.8)
Age-standardised prevalence: % (95% CI)
55.0 (53.2 to 56.9)
42.8 (37.3 to 48.3)
54.0 (44.8 to 63.2)
13.1 (9.4 to 16.8)
16.6 (10.0 to 23.2)
6.5 (5.6 to 7.4)
10.0 (6.7 to 13.3)
11.2 (5.4 to 16.9)
12.1 (10.9 to 13.3)
15.9 (11.8 to 20.0)
17.5 (10.6 to 24.3)
14.1 (12.8 to 15.4)
Thomas et al 15 (2012)South AfricaRetrospective observational study Ethnicity
Caucasian, indigenous African, Asian and mixed race
T1DM
Classified as having T1DM on clinical assessment according to the American Diabetes Association classification of diabetes
Method
Retinal photography was conducted using a non-mydriatic digital camera without mydriasis and graded by one of three senior graders.
Caucasian: 1247
Indigenous African: 117
Asian: 118
Mixed race: 49
Mean age (years)
Caucasian: 35.7
Indigenous African: 36.3
Asian: 32.2
Mixed race: 32.6
2001–
2010
DR
Caucasian (1247)
Indigenous African (117)
Asian (118)
Mixed race (49)
Any DR (n=541)
Crude OR (95% CI)
1.00
0.71 (0.46 to 1.09)
1.10 (0.74 to 1.63)
1.01 (0.56 to 1.84)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
1.00
1.72 (1.00 to 2.97)
2.02 (1.23 to 3.29)
1.29 (0.62 to 2.69)
RDR (n=142)
Crude OR (95% CI)
1.00
0.95 (0.49 to 1.84)
1.05 (0.54 to 2.04)
1.10 (0.42 to 2.88)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
1.00
3.40 (1.40 to 8.26)
2.07 (0.90 to 4.75)
1.06 (0.36 to 3.18)
Omar et al 17 1984South AfricaCrosssectional analysis Ethnicity
2 groups: Indians and Black African.
T1DM
Patients with onset of IDDM <35 years at King Edward Hospital in Durban. Diagnosis of IDDM based on the criteria recommended by WHO.
Method
Both case records obtained and a physical examination performed to assess complications.
Black African: 92Indians: 41Mean age at onset (yrs) Blacks: 17 Indians: 23.5Not mentioned Complications
Keto-acidosis
Neuropathy peripheral autonomic
Retinopathy
Nephropathy
Triopathy
Ischaemic heart disease
Hypertension
Cataracts
Tuberculosis
Black African
53 (58%)
20 (22%)
4 (4%)
13 (14%)
3 (3%)
1 (1%)
-
4 (4%)
5 (5%)
6 (7%)
Indians
22 (54%)
13 (32%)
2 (5%)
9 (22%)
3 (7%)
2 (5%)
-
2 (5%)
2 (5%)
1 (2%)
Total
75 (56%)
33 (25%)
6 (5%)
22 (17%)
6 (5%)
3 (2%)
-
6 (5%)
7 (5%)
7 (5%)
  • bp, blood pressure; BMI, body mass index; CSMO, clinically significant macular oedema;CVD, cardiovascular disease; DR,diabetic retinopathy; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein;eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IDDM, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; LDL, low-density lipoprotein;M1, maculopathy; NCH, New Cross Hospital;P1, macular laser;QEH, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; R1, mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; R2, preproliferative diabetic retinopathy; R3, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; SA, South Asian; SANGRA, South Asian Names and Group Recognition Algorithm;SMR, standardised mortality ratio;STDR,sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; WE, white European.

  • *p Value <0.05.