Table 2

Data collection form*

Title of review Low-value clinical practices in injury care: a scoping review
Reviewer
Date of review
Form version 1.0 (2017-01-16)
Contact with author Date, reason, resolved
Notes
Study identification
Report number Last name first author—year of the reference
Study number Last name first author—year of the primary reference
Title
Author(s)
Source 1 □ research article □ abstract □ conference proceeding
□ non-research article □ review □ guideline □ recommendation other (eg, unpublished data):
Source 2 □ MEDLINE □ EMBASE □ Cochrane □ BIOSIS □ ClinicalTrials □ ISRCTN □ Thesis repository □ Website □ Reference listing
Other (grey literature):
Year
Volume
Page (start-end)
Contact
Country
Language
Funding □ NA
Notes
Eligibility of study in the review
Inclusion criteria □ Injury population
□ potentially low-value clinical practice
Notes
Study details
Setting Country(ies)/province(s)/state(s); trauma system(s); number and level of centres
Period of study Dates start-end
Study inclusion □ AgeCriteria:□ NA
criteria □ Injury severityCriteria:□ NA
□ Injury typeCriteria:□ NA
□ Other List all other inclusion criteria □ NA
Study exclusion criteria List all exclusion criteria □ NA
REB approval □ yes □ no □ unclear
Study design □ prospective cohort □ retrospective cohort □ population-based □ unclear
Other:
Notes
Study data
Primary data source
Secondary data source
Other data sources
Notes
Population characteristics
Sample size (n) Patients :
Age e.g. n(%)≥65 yoa, mean (SD), median (quartiles)
Gender n(%) male
Injury mechanism e.g. n(%) penetrating, motor vehicle collision
Injury severity e.g. n(%) Injury Severity Score>15, Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale score>3
Injury type e.g. n(%) traumatic brain; spinal cord; thoracoabdominal; orthopaedic; multisystem blunt
Notes
Low-value clinical practice (one per practice)
Practice
Type of practice □ consultation □ screening □ diagnostic procedure □ monitoring □ therapeutic procedure
Other:
Type of overuse □ inappropriate for a specified clinical indication
□ inappropriate for clinical indication in a specific population
□ excessive service intensity or sophistication given expected clinical benefit
□ inappropriate for clinical indication in a specific population
□ excessive frequency of service given expected clinical benefit
Other:
Frequency e.g. n(%)
  • NA: not available, MEDLINE: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE: Excerpta Medica database, BIOSIS: Biosciences Information Service, ISRCTN: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number

  • *Adapted from Cochrane Consumer and Communication Review Group Data extraction template.