Table 1

Demographic and occupational characteristics and respondent reading behaviour (n=1008)

Demographic and occupational characteristicsn (%)
Age (years)*
 ≤34101 (11.6)
 35–44196 (22.5)
 45–54308 (35.3)
 ≥55268 (30.7)
Gender*
 Female643(73.7)
 Male230(26.3)
Professional role*
 Allied health professional25 (2.9)
 Medical practitioner240 (27.5)
 Nurse277 (31.7)
 Paramedic24 (2.7)
 Pharmacist35 (4.0)
 Quality and risk manager99 (11.3)
 Other173 (19.8)
Experience in profession (years)*
 ≤5183 (21.0)
  6–10130 (14.9)
 11–15115 (13.2)
 16–2086 (9.9)
 ≥21359 (41.1)
Workplace setting*
 Government department/agency41 (4.7)
 Hospital—acute451 (51.7)
 Hospital—subacute47 (5.4)
 Primary care72 (8.2)
 Residential aged care service109 (12.5)
 University or other academic32 (3.7)
 Other121 (13.9)
State or country*
 Victoria549 (62.9)
 Other state or territory of Australia313 (35.9)
 Other country11 (1.3)
Frequency of patient interaction per week (days)*
 <1230 (26.3)
 158 (6.6)
 2 or 3107 (12.3)
 4 or more478 (54.8)
Level of contact with Coroners Court*
 Taken part in an inquest148 (17.0)
 Provided a statement207 (23.7)
 Contacted Court to discuss if death was reportable338 (38.7)
 Contacted Court for other reasons289 (33.1)
 No contact299 (34.2)
Respondent reading behaviour and preferences
Respondent reading behaviour
 Read all four issues†466 (47.1)
 Read all or almost all of each issue‡747 (79.0)
Respondents regularly read the following sections§,
 Case summaries927 (99.3)
 Expert commentary916 (98.0)
 Editorial821 (88.1)
 Resources list525 (56.6)
Use of the Clinical Communiqué‡,
 I read it as soon as it arrives802 (84.9)
 I encourage my colleagues to read it681 (72.1)
 I refer to it in my job407 (43.1)
 I use it as a teaching aid590 (62.4)
Number of people with access to the Clinical Communiqué‡,**
 Only myself441 (46.7)
 One other person53 (5.6)
 3 to 5 other people124 (13.1)
 6 to 10 other people85 (9.0)
 11 to 20 other people73 (7.7)
 21 to 30 other people62 (6.6)
 More than 31 other people107 (11.3)
  • * One hundred and thirty-five respondents failed to answer this question and were not included in the analysis (n=873).

  • Nineteen respondents failed to answer this question and were not included in the analysis (n=989).

  • Sixty-three respondents failed to answer this question and were not included in the analysis (n=945).

  • § The number of respondents varies for this question (n=934, 935, 932, 928) respectively.

  • Five-point Likert scale, 5=strongly agree to 1=strongly disagree. Positive responses are counted as the sum of responses that stated ‘strongly agree’ and ‘agree’.

  • ** The reach of the Clinical Communiqué was calculated from these results. The lower (28 575) and upper ranges (30 958) were determined by multiplying the number of respondents with the extremes of their response. Respondents who answered ‘more than 31 other people’ to this question were given an option to provide the actual number and where available, this response was used in the calculation

  • NB. Because of rounding not all percentages cumulatively sum to 100