Table 2

Subgroup analyses of the effect of Tai Chi for preventing falls in older adults

Number of fallersRate of falls
SubgroupStudiesParticipantsRR (95% CI)StudiesFallsIRR (95% CI)
The style of Tai Chi
 Yang style Tai Chi713–15 24 26 28 359430.61 (0.46 to 0.80)813–15 22 24 26 28 355280.54 (0.42 to 0.70)
 Sun style Tai Chi323 30 3317770.88 (0.80, 0.98)323 30 3316840.91 (0.75 to 1.11)
Test for subgroup differences: p=0.01Test for subgroup differences: p=0.001
Tai Chi frequency
 Once a week312 30 3313160.95 (0.84 to 1.07)412 22 30 3312940.84 (0.63 to 1.13)
 Twice a week623 27 28 30 32 3416380.83 (0.76 to 0.92)623 27 28 30 32 3416410.73 (0.57 to 0.95)
 Three times a week613–15 24 25 295840.62 (0.51 to 0.75)413–15 244540,48 (0.36 to 0.64)
 >Three times a week226 352320.36 (0.13 to 0.98)226 35810.38 (0.18 to 0.65)
Test for subgroup differences: p=0.001Test for subgroup differences: p=0.07
Total exercise time
 ≤30 hours524 28 30 32 3315860.85 (0.73 to 0.99)524 28 30 32 3314980.84 (0.67 to 1.07)
 >30 and ≤60 hours612 25 26 28 30 329840.81 (0.65 to 1.00)512 24 28 30 3211380.58 (0.35 to 0.94)
 >60 hours414 23 34 3510070.80 (0.67 to 0.94)514 22 23 34 354370.64 (0.49, to0.84)
Test for subgroup differences: p=0.82Test for subgroup differences: p=0.20
Time of follow-up
 >1 and ≤3 months415 24 26 339260.63 (0.44 to 0.89)515 24 26 27 334780.46 (0.30 to 0.69)
 >3 and ≤6 months414 23 27 3314110.79 (0.65 to 0.94)414 23 27 336330.67 (0.52 to 0.86)
 >6 and ≤12 months1012 13 23 25 28–30 32 34 3525260.85 (0.78 to 0.93)812 13 23 28 30 32 34 3526330.85 (0.73 to 0.98)
Test for subgroup differences: p=0.23Test for subgroup differences: p=0.01
Falling risk at enrolment
 High424 28 30 3211220.83 (0.70 to 0.98)424 28 30 3219340.90 (0.75 to 1.07)
 Low1212–15 23 25–27 29 33–3524170.78 (0.68 to 0.89)1112–15 23 26 27 29 33–3515360.62 (0.50 to 0.76)
Test for subgroup differences: p=0.57Test for subgroup differences: p=0.02
  • IRR, incidence rate ratio; RR, risk ratio.