Table 3

Data collection and tools

Concept/theory to be explored	Proposed methods	Main stakeholder group and number*	Total totals
Intervention inputs	Document analysis	MoH, World Vision Records	NA
Intervention inputs	Key informant interviews	Programme managers, MoH manager (n=5)	5
Community coalition action theory	Coalition Self- Assessment Survey (CSAS)	Delivered to all CHC members (n=10)	10
	In-depth interviews	CHC members (n=4 per group)	4
	Observations	CHC group meetings	NA
	Document review	CHC meeting minutes, WV and MoH documentation	NA
External support	In-depth interviews	CHC members (n=5 per group)	5
	Focus group discussions	Community health workers (n=1 group, with 6–8 people)	6–8
	Key informant Interviews	Programme managers, MoH manager (n=4)	4
Community responsiveness	Focus group discussions	Community health workers (n=1 group, with 6–8 people)	6–8
Community responsiveness	Focus group discussions	Male and female community members (n=2, with 6–8 people per group)	6–8
Capacity building and other outcomes	In-depth interviews	CHC members (n=5 per group)	5
	Focus group discussions	Community Health Workers (n=1 group, with 6–8 people)	6–8
	Focus group discussions	Male and female community members (n=2, with 6–8 people per group)	6–8
	Key informant interviews	Programme managers, MoH manager (n=5)	5
	Domains of capacity survey	Administered to all participants (n=40)	40
	Document review	MoH, WV and CHC documentation	NA
Total estimated number of participants in each case study			40

*To be carried out in each CHC within each site. A proposed 2–3 groups will be studied in each location.
†Methods will not be duplicated (ie, only 1 FGD with CHWs), but the theories will be explored within these.
CHC, community health committee; CHWs, community health workers; FGD, focus group discussion; NA, not applicable.