Table 3

Justification of choice of margin, total number of patient populations considered for analyses and patient population included in the analysis

All articles (N=168)Including NEJM protocols (N=61)
n (%)n (%)
Justification of NI margin
 Made no attempt for justification90 (54)22 (36)
 Clinical basis. No evidence for consultation with external expert group, and no reference to previous trials of the control arm32 (19)11 (18)
 Preservation of treatment effect based on estimates of control arm effect from previous trials13 (8)14 (23)
 Expert group external to the authors. No reference to previous trials of the control arm6 (4)3 (5)
 The same margin as was used in other similar trials5 (32 (3)
 10–12% recommended by disease-specific FDA guidelines4 (2)1 (2)
 General comment that margin was decided according to FDA/regulatory guidance4 (2)0
 Clinical basis and based on previous similar trial. No evidence for consultation with external expert group, and no reference to previous trials of the control arm3 (2)0
 Based on registry/development programme02 (3)
 Other*11 (7)6 (10)
Number of analyses
 One65 (39)15 (25)
 Two91 (54)38 (62)
 Three10 (6)7 (11)
 Not defined2 (1)1 (2)
Analysis
 ITT129 (77)44 (72)
 PP90 (54)35 (57)
 mITT34 (20)17 (28)
 As-treated4 (2)6 (10)
 Other20 (12)10 (16)
 Unclear2 (1)2 (3)
  • *See online supplementary material.

  • ITT, intention to treat; mITT, modified intention to treat; PP, per-protocol.