Table 3

Smoking cessation outcomes at 12 months follow-up comparing participants in observation phase (August 2009 to October 2010) and intervention phase (November 2010 to February 2012) at four university sites in Switzerland. Seven-day point prevalence abstinence, validated by exhaled carbon monoxide*

N total for analysisPer cent of quit in obs. phase/interv. phaseRisk ratio (95% CI)Absolute risk difference (%)p Value
Main outcome
 Intervention sites (study sites A and B) (n=458)44342.0/50.21.20 (0.98 to 1.47)8.30.08
 Control sites (study sites C and D) (n=436)42846.8/47.81.02 (0.84 to 1.25)1.10.8
Secondary analyses for participants in intervention sites (study sites A and B) (n=440)
Cardiac rehabilitation
 With cardiac rehabilitation29651.5/53.71.04 (0.84 to 1.30)2.20.7
 No cardiac rehabilitation14329.5/43.61.48 (0.95 to 2.30)14.10.09
Education status
 University degree 6459.3/51.30.87 (0.56 to 1.34)−7.90.5
 No university degree37140.7/50.81.24 (1.0 to 1.6)10.10.05
  • *Participants lost to follow-up or who withdrew consent (n=11, 97% follow-up rate) considered as smokers for these analyses. Participants who died (n=15) during follow-up excluded from these analyses. Validated smoking cessation by carbon monoxide (CO) in 68% of quitters in intervention sites and 40% of quitters in control sites. Two participants reported having quit during last 7 days despite a CO level of more than 10 ppm considered as smokers.

  • N, number of participants.