Table 2

Clinicians' risk–benefit appraisals

Question/dimensionAll clinicians combined (n=58)ED physicians (n=23)Neurospecialists (n=35)p Value
Routine LP justified? ‘No’23 (40%)14 (61%)9 (26%)
Routine LP justified? ‘Yes’35 (60%)9 (39%)26 (74%)0.007
Investigative inertia ‘No’45 (78%)20 (87%)25 (71%)
Investigative inertia ‘Yes’13 (22%)3 (13%)10 (29%)0.2
Required LP pick-up rate: ≥1 SAH every 100 LPs25 (44%)12 (52%)13 (38%)*
1 SAH every 101–500 LPs19 (33%)8 (35%)11 (32%)*
1 SAH for every >500 LPs13 (23%)3 (13%)10 (29%)*0.3
Risk–benefit trade off†
 Non-invasive test
  Yes12 (21%)8 (38%)‡4 (11%)0.018
  No44 (79%)13 (62%)‡31 (89%)
Quicker test
 Yes5 (9%)2 (10%)‡3 (9%)*0.9
 No50 (89%)19 (90%)‡31 (89%)*
Cheaper test
 Yes5 (9%)2 (10%)‡3 (9%)*0.9
 No50 (89%)19 (90%)‡31 (89%)*
Experience of previous missed SAH ‘No’5 (9%)2 (9%)3 (9%)*
Experience of previous missed SAH ‘Yes’52 (91%)21 (91%)31 (91%)*0.9
  • *Question omitted by one consultant.

  • †Participants were asked if they would accept a higher risk of missed SAH in the given scenarios: quicker, cheaper or non-invasive test.

  • ‡Question omitted by two consultants.

  • LP, lumbar puncture.