Table 6

Studies reporting preoperative physical function as possible predictor of functional outcome after THA

 MeasurementFU periodSignificance
Author, yearGradeN of ptstool(months)Level (p value)AssociationPredictor level of measurement
Quintana, 2009Moderate788WOMAC PFST (6 m)<0.001YesCont (WOMAC+SF-36)
SF-36 PF
Slaven, 2012Low40TUGST (6 m)NANoDich
(successful/unsuccessful)
Mahomed, 2002Moderate103WOMAC PF+PST (6 m)<0.05YesCont (WOMAC+SF-36)
SF-36 PF<0.05
Hamilton, 2012Low1410OHSST (6 m)YesYesCont (OHS)
SF-12ST (12 m)
Nankaku, 2013Moderate204Ambulatory status ST (6 m)NAYesDich (TUG score 10)
Vogl, 2014Low281WOMACST (6 m)NAYesCont (WOMAC)
Bergschmidt, 2010Moderate100WOMACST (12 m)<0.022YesCat (3)
SF-360.0031: HHS<48 2: HHS 48–59 3: HHS>59
Clement, 2010High1312OHSST (12 m)0.001*YesCont (OHS)
SF-12
Johansson, 2010Moderate75HHSST (12 m)?0.006YesCat (3)
WOMAC<0.001Yes1: HHS<45 2: HHS 45–55 3: HHS>55
SF-36?0.005Yes
Nilsdotter, 2002Moderate148WOMACST (12 m)<0.0001YesDich
SF-36Low quartile vs high quartile WOMAC
Dowsey, 2014High835HHSST (12 m)<0.0001YesCont (HHS)
Wang, 2010Moderate97WOMACST (16.8 m)0.0001YesCont (WOMAC PF)
Moran, 2005Moderate749HHSST (18 m)NAYesCont
Fortin, 2002Low222WOMACST (24 m)NAYesDig (1: high WOMAC 2: low WOMAC)
SF-36NAYes
Smith, 2012Moderate1683HHSLT (36 m)<0.001YesCont (HHS)
Nilsdotter, 2003Low211WOMAC PFLT (42 m)0.007YesDich
Low quartile vs high quartile SF-36 PF
Judge, 2013High1431OHSLT (60 m)<0.001YesCont (OHS)
  • All significant results are bold.

  • BMI, body mass index; Cat, categorical; Cont, continuous; Dich, dichotomous; FU, follow-up; HHS, Harris Hip Score; LT, long-term; N of pts, number of patients; NA, not applicable; Neg, negative; OHS, Oxford Hip Score; Pos, positive; SF-36 PF, Short Form 36 physical function; ST, short-term; THA, total hip arthroplasty; WOMAC, Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.