Table 4

Reporting of systematic review papers and systematic review authors of different types of COI, stratified by Cochrane (N=100), non-Cochrane (N=94) and overall (N=194)

Percentages of papers with at least one author reporting the type of COI; N (%)Distributions of the percentages of authors per paper reporting COI*; median (IQR)
OverallCochraneNon-CochraneOverallCochraneNon-Cochrane
Types of COI
 At least one type†80 (41%)49 (49%)31 (33%)35 (24–62)33 (20–50)50 (32–67)
 Individual financial60 (31%)32 (32%)28 (30%)35 (20–59)29 (20–50)42 (27–62)
 Individual professional5 (3%)5 (5%)0 (0%)33 (25–75)33 (25–75)NA
 Individual intellectual†24 (12%)19 (19%)5 (5%)25 (17–50)25 (20–50)14 (9–47)
 Institutional financial19 (10%)7 (7%)12 (13%)25 (11–29)25 (20–25)23 (10–29)
 Institutional advocatory7 (4%)5 (5%)2 (2%)20 (9–25)22 (18–25)
 ‘Other types’†16 (8%)12 (12%)4 (4%)20 (14–25)20 (15–25)19 (7–25)
Provided a ‘loogly statement’†29 (15%)24 (24%)5 (5%)33 (23–63)42 (21–69)29 (19–67)
  • *Calculated for systematic review papers with at least one author reporting the type of COI (ie, papers counted in the preceding column).

  • †p Value for the difference between Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews is statistically significant.

  • ‡Authors of only two non-Cochrane reviews reported institutional advocatory COI, with the percentages being 5% and 9%.

  • COI, conflict of interest; NA, not applicable.