Table 3

Summary of quantitative data responses to the nine domains in the patient satisfaction questionnaire administered at 3 months postintervention, when the primary outcome assessment took place

Intervention componentPEQ domainTrial groupRespondentsMedian score* (cm)1st, 3rd quartile (cm)Interquartile distance (cm)Median difference (95% CI) (cm)p Value
PhysiotherapyExercises to get you moving/back on your feetU
I
83
95
6.1
5.0
1.2, 10.3
1.1, 7.9
9.1
6.8
1.40 (0.00 to 4.00)0.039†
Nutritional careHelp with eating and nutritionU
I
87
95
9.9
5.4
4.8, 14.5
2.3, 10.0
9.7
7.7
1.60 (0.00 to 3.80)0.038†
Case managementTransfer from ICU to the wardU
I
73
67
5.7
5.2
1.7, 14.9
4.8, 10.0
13.2
5.2
0.20 (−0.90 to 2.80)0.481
Ward staff's understanding of your time in intensive careU
I
78
87
5.1
5.1
1.1, 10.2
1.9, 8.0
9.1
6.1
0.00 (−1.10 to 1.20)0.850
Help, support and advice with being independentU
I
81
95
5.5
5.3
1.2, 10.1
2.6, 10.0
8.9
7.4
0.10 (−1.10 to 1.40)0.787
Being involved in decisions about your careU
I
81
91
10.0
7.3
5.0, 15.0
4.8, 14.3
10.0
9.5
0.70 (−0.40 to 3.30)0.226
Organisation and coordination of careU
I
83
96
7.1
5.3
4.8, 12.0
2.2, 10.0
7.2
7.8
1.30 (0.00 to 3.50)0.045†
Information provisionInformation about what happened in intensive careU
I
68
83
10.2
3.6
5.0, 16.9
1.0, 10.0
11.9
9.0
4.90 (2.80 to 8.00)<0.001†
Knowing what to expect after you got homeU
I
81
89
10.0
7.2
5.0, 15.0
2.6, 14.9
10.0
12.3
0.50 (−0.40 to 3.30)0.308
  • *VAS scores: excellent (0), very good (5), good (10), ok (15) and poor (20).

  • †p values are with the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test; as this test is not a median test but a rank sum test, the point estimates are not the difference between the two medians.

  • I, intervention group; ICU, intensive care unit; PEQ, patient experience questionnaire; U, usual care group; VAS, visual analogue scale.