Table 3

Quality appraisal of trials

Author, yearRandomisedRandomisation methodType of randomisationAllocation concealmentBlindingPer cent Lost to follow-upITT
MiddelkoopRCTDate of birthNSNSNoneNSNS
Shenoy, 2009RCTNSNSNSNone3NS
Shenoy, 2010RCTNSNSNSNoneNSYes
ShantakumariRandomised parallel studyNSNSNSNoneNSNS
VaishaliRCTNSBlockSealed opaque envelopesNone5.3NS
HawthorneRCTRandom number tablesNSSealed envelopesNone6.5No
AdepuRCTNSNSNSNone14.3No
BaradaranRCTNSMinimisationNSNone37.3No
GhoshRCTNSNSNSNoneYesNS
MalathyRCTNSNSNSNoneNoneYes
HameedRCTRandom number tablesNSNSNoneYesYes
ShettyRCTRandom number tablesNSNSNoneNSNo
O’HareCluster RCTNoneNSNSNone10.0No
BellaryCluster RCTSimpleSimpleNSNS10.8Yes
VyasCluster RCTNSBy GP practice4NSNS44No
DeSouza, 2003, 2004Pretest post-testConvenience samplingNANANoneNSYes
Balagopal, 2008Pretest post-testNANANANoneYes: refusalsYes
Balagopal, 2012Pretest post-testNANANANoneYes: migration and refusalsYes
MirsaPretest post-testNANANANoneNSYes
ChoudhuryPretest post-testNANANANone8.9No
PandePretest post-testNANANANoneNSNS
SinghPretest post-testNANANANSNSNS
Madanmohan, 2012Pretest post-testNANANANS<1Yes
  • ITT, intention-to-treat; NA, not applicable; NS, not specified; RCT, randomised controlled trial.