Table 5

Logistic regression analysis for the effect of self-efficacy on rural career intention

Increased interest in rural medical practiceIntention to practice in rural areas
Model 1Model 2Model AModel BModel C
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Gender (female)1.5 (1.0 to 2.5)*1.5 (0.9 to 2.5)2.2 (1.4 to 3.2)**2.0 (1.3 to 3.1)*1.9 (1.2 to 2.9)*
Rural background1.3 (0.9 to 2.2)1.0 (0.6 to 1.7)3.5 (2.4 to 5.4)**3.5 (2.3 to 5.3)**2.7 (1.8 to 4.3)**
Preferred RCS3.4 (2.1 to 5.6)**2.1 (1.2 to 3.7)**4.3 (2.1 to 9.0)**3.6 (1.7 to 7.7)**2.5 (1.2 to 5.5)*
General practice intention at entry0.8 (0.5 to 1.3)3.3 (2.2 to 4.9)**3.5 (2.3 to 5.3)**3.5 (2.9 to 5.5)**
Increased interest in rural medical practice4.2 (1.8 to 9.3)**2.6 (1.1 to 6.3)*
Self-efficacy score1.4 (1.3 to 1.5)**1.2 (1.1 to 1.3)**
Model χ229.2100.8135.0147.8180.7
Cox and Shell R20.040.140.190.210.25
  • *p<0.05, **p<0.001.

  • RCS, rural clinical school.