Table 2

Table of estimated effect sizes for impact analysis studies

Author, year CPR nameStudy design (n)Sample size calculation reported (n)Primary outcomeEffect size: crude OR of improvement in primary outcome in intervention vs control (95% CI)Absolute risk reductions (95% CI)
Auleley, 199715 Ottawa ankle ruleCluster RCT (4980)Yes (900)Physician behaviour: referral for radiography (ankle/foot)Crude OR 0.03 (0.01 to 0.06)22.8% (20.0% to 25.7%)
Stiell, 199416 Ottawa ankle ruleControlled before–after (2342)NAPhysician behaviour: referral for radiography (ankle/foot)Ankle X-ray: crude OR 0.11 (0.08 to 0.16)
Foot X-ray: crude OR 0.73 (0.57 to 0.94)
33.4% (28.9% to 37.9%)
6.6% (1.1% to 11.7%)
Cameron, 199919 Ottawa ankle ruleControlled before–after (1648)NAPhysician behaviour: referral for ankle X-rayCrude OR 0.96 (0.60 to 1.55)0.8% (−8.5% to 9.8%)
Boutis, 201320 Low-risk ankle ruleITS (2151)NAPhysician behaviour: referral for ankle X-rayNANA
Stiell, 199717 Ottawa knee ruleControlled before–after (3907)NAPhysician behaviour: referral for knee radiographyCrude OR 0.42 (0.35 to 0.51)18.8% (14.7% to 22.9%)
Stiell, 200918 Canadian C-spine ruleCluster RCT (11 824)Yes (9600)Physician behaviour: diagnostic imaging rate of cervical spineCrude OR 0.82 (0.74 to 0.90)5% (2.5% to 7.5%)
Pozen, 198421 Pozen score for chest painITS (2320)NAPhysician behaviour: appropriate admissionNANA
Kline, 200922 Kline chest pain CPRRCT (369)Yes (400)Physician behaviour: admission with no significant cardiovascular diagnosisCrude OR 0.47 (0.22 to 1.04)5.4% (−0.2% to 10.9%)
Persell, 201227 Framingham risk scoreCluster RCT (425)Yes (406)Patient:
proportion of patients with a reduction in LDL-cholesterol level by 30 mg/dL
Crude OR 0.99 (0.55 to 1.81)0.1% (−0.0% to 0.0%)
Grover, 2007 and 200825 26 Framingham risk scoreRCT (3053)Yes (3000)
  • Patient:

  • reduction in LDL-cholesterol level

Reduction in LDL-cholesterol level: mean difference −0.33 mg/dL (−0.5.4 to −1.1; p=0.02)NA
Hall, 200323 New Zealand cardiovascular risk scorePilot RCT (323)NAPhysician behaviour: prescription of risk modifying drugs, management of CVD risk factorsDiabetes treatment: crude OR 1.28 (0.82 to 2.01)
Antihypertensive drugs: crude OR 1.62 (0.84 to 3.12)
Lipid lowering drugs: crude OR 1.48 (0.72 to 3.04)
Referral to dietician: crude OR 0.78 (0.40 to 1.54)
−6.0% (−16.6% to 4.7%)
−5.5% (−12.9% to 1.9%)
−3.7% (−10.3% to 3.0%)
2.5% (−4.47% to 9.57%)
Hanon, 200024 Framingham risk scoreRCT (1243)NoPatient and physician behaviour: BP, patients prescribed dual therapyNormal BP: crude OR 1.09 (0.87 to 1.38)
Dual therapy: crude OR 0.82 (0.65 to 1.02)
−2.1% (−7.4% to 3.3%)
4.9% (−0.6% to 10.4%)
McIsaac, 200229 McIsaacRCT (621 patients, 97 physicians)Yes (850 patients, 85 physicians)Physician behaviour: unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions (negative throat swab)Crude OR 0.71 (0.47 to 1.08)4.9% (−1.1% to 10.9%)
McIsaac, 199828 CentorRCT (396)Yes (800)Physician behaviour: antibiotic prescriptionCrude OR 0.69 (0.45 to 1.05)8.1% (−1.0% to 17.3%)
McGinn, 201332 (1) Walsh rule (streptococcal pharyngitis)
(2) Heckerling rule (pneumonia)
RCT (168)NoPhysician behaviour: change in antibiotic prescriptionCrude OR 0.66 (0.50 to 0.86)9.3% (3.2% to 15.3%)
Worrall, 200730 Modified Centor scoreRCT (533)Yes (196)Physician behaviour: prescribing rate of antibioticsCrude OR 0.89 (0.57 to 1.40)2.9% (−8.2% to 13.9%)
Little, 201331 FeverPAINRCT (6131)Yes (909)Patient behaviour: patient-reported symptom severityAdjusted mean difference−0.33 (−0.64 to −0.02; p=0.04)NA
Stiell, 201033 CT head ruleCluster RCT (4531)Yes (4800)Physician behaviour: proportion of patients referred for CT imagingCrude OR 0.81 (0.69 to 0.96)4.7% (1.0% to 8.4%)
  • CPR, clinical prediction rule.