Table 2

Differences in the time for intubation according to the device used and level of professional experience

Total participantsMACATQGLSAPA
Successful intubation42414242
 Minimum13.812.113.511.4
 Maximum96.415693.399.4
 Mean31.437.135.423.6*
 SD16.328.221.614.5
Residents <2 years
Successful intubation10101010
 Minimum16.317.32014.2
 Maximum63.359.292.238.75
 Mean34.934.346.623.7†
SD13.813.725.78.6
Residents 2–5 years
Successful intubation12121212
 Minimum16.822.317.917.9
 Maximum96.415666.649.5
 Mean33.247.831.026.4
 SD20.839.114.710.9
Specialists >5 years
Successful intubation20192020
 Minimum13.812.113.4511.4
 Maximum78.199.393.399.4
 Mean28.531.932.421.9‡
 SD14.725.121.818.5
  • Data are presented as numbers, time(s) and means±SDs.

  • *Tracheal intubation was significantly faster using the APA compared with all of the other devices (p<0.05).

  • †Residents with experience of <2 years performed intubation significantly faster with the APA than with the GLS (p<0.05).

  • ‡Specialists with experience of >5 years performed intubation significantly faster with the APA than with the GLS or MAC (p<0.05).

  • APA, AP Advance; ATQ, Airtraq; GLS, Glidescope; MAC, Macintosh.