Study | Participants and baseline data | Intervention/outcomes |
---|---|---|
Dapagliflozin | ||
Bailey et al14 Setting: multicentre (n=80) Design: four-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT, dual therapy. Only 10 mg arm included in NMA Follow-up: 24 weeks; 102 weeks | N: 534 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (≥1500 mg/day) Age (years): dapa 10 mg+metformin 52.7, SD 9.9; placebo+metformin 53.7, SD 10.3 HbA1c (%): dapa 10 mg+metformin 7.92, SD 0.82; placebo+metformin 8.11, SD 0.96 BMI (kg/m2): dapa 10 mg+metformin 31.2, SD 5.1; placebo+metformin 31.8, SD 5.3 | Interventions
|
Bolinder et al11 Setting: multicentre (n=40) in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Sweden Design: two-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT in dual therapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 180 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (≥1500 mg/day) Age (years): dapa 10 mg+metformin 60.6, SD 8.2; placebo+metformin 60.8, SD 6.9 HbA1c (%): dapa 10 mg+metformin 7.19, SD 0.44; placebo+metformin 7.16, SD 0.53. Note the very low baseline level BMI (kg/m2): dapa 10 mg+metformin 32.1, SD 3.9; placebo+metformin 31.7, SD 3.9 | Intervention
|
Ferrannini et al15 Setting: multicentre (n=85) in the USA, Canada, Mexico and Russia Design: double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RCT in monotherapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 274 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise, naïve to treatment Age (years): dapa 10 mg 50.6, SD 9.97; placebo 52.7, SD 10.3 HbA1c (%): dapa 10 mg 8.01, SD 0.96; placebo 7.84, SD 0.87 BMI (kg/m2): dapa 10 mg+metformin 33.6, SD 5.4; placebo+metformin 32.3, SD 5.5 | Intervention
|
Henry et al12 —Two studies (focusing on study 2) Setting: multicentre (n=131)—hospitals and clinics in North America, Latin America, Europe and Asia Design: double-blind, active controlled trials in dual therapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 638 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise, naïve to treatment Age (years): dapa 10 mg+metformin 51.5, SD 10.1; placebo+metformin 52.7, SD 10.4 HbA1c (%): dapa 10 mg+metformin 9.1, SD 1.3; placebo+metformin 9.1, SD 1.3 BMI (kg/m2): NR | Intervention
|
Ji et al17 Setting: multicentre (n=40) in China (n=26), Korea (n=5), Taiwan (n=5) and India (n=4) Design: double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, RCT, monotherapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 393 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes naïve to drug treatment (prescription medication for diabetes including Chinese traditional medicines for diabetes, or prescription medication for diabetes for <24 weeks since diagnosis) Age (years): dapa 10 mg 51.2, SD 9.89; placebo 49.9, SD 10.87 HbA1c (%): dapa 10 mg 8.28, SD 0.95; placebo 8.35, SD 0.95 BMI (kg/m2): dapa 10 mg 25.76, SD 3.43; placebo 25.93, SD 3.64 | Intervention
|
Kaku et al23 2014 Setting: multicentre (n=NR) in Japan Design: double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled RCT, monotherapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 261 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes naïve to drug treatment Age (years): dapa 10 mg 57.5, SD 9.3; placebo 60.4, SD 9.7 HbA1c (%): dapa 10 mg 7.46, SD 0.61; placebo 7.50, SD 0.63 BMI (kg/m2): dapa 10 mg 26.6, SD 4.52; placebo 25.22, SD 4.39 | Intervention
|
Canagliflozin | ||
Lavalle-Gonzalez et al19 Setting: multicentre (n=169) in 22 countries Design: double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial, dual therapy Duration: 26 weeks | N: 1284 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin Age (years): cana 100 mg+metformin 55.5, SD 9.4; cana 300 mg+metformin 55.3, SD 9.2; placebo+metformin 55.3, SD 9.8 HbA1c (%): cana 100 mg+metformin 7.9, SD 0.9; cana 300 mg+metformin 7.9, SD 0.9; placebo+metformin 8.0, SD 0.9 BMI (kg/m2): cana 100 mg+metformin 32.4, SD 6.4; cana 300 mg+metformin 31.4, SD 6.3; placebo+metformin 31.1, SD 6.1 | Intervention
|
Stenlof et al13 Setting: multicentre (n=NR) in 17 countries Design: double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 RCT, monotherapy Duration: 26 weeks | N: 584 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise and also on antihypoglycaemic agents who underwent washout (8 weeks and diet and exercise period with placebo run-in period) of the agent Age (years): cana 100 mg 55.1, SD 10.8; cana 300 mg 55.3, SD 10.2; placebo 55.7, SD 10.9 HbA1c (%): cana 100 mg 8.1, SD 1.0; cana 300 mg 0, SD 1.0; placebo 8.0, SD 1.0 BMI (kg/m2): cana 100 mg 31.3, SD 6.6; cana 300 mg 31.7, SD 6.0; placebo 31.8, SD 6.2 | Intervention
|
Inagaki et al22 Setting: multicenter (n=31) in Japan Design: double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 parallel group trial Duration: 24 weeks | N: 272 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise Age (years): cana 100 mg 58.4, SD 10.4; placebo 58.2, SD 11.0 HbA1c (%): cana 100 mg 7.98, SD 0.73; placebo 8.04, SD 0.70 BMI (kg/m2): cana 100 mg 25.59, SD 4.20; placebo 25.85, SD 4.39 | Intervention
|
Empa | ||
Haring et al16 Setting: multicentre (n=148) in 12 countries (Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Korea, Mexico, Slovakia, Slovenia, Taiwan, Turkey and the USA) Design: double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 RCT, dual therapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 637 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise and a stable immediate-release metformin regimen Age (years): empa 10 mg+metformin 55.5, SD 9.9; empa 25 mg+metformin 55.6, SD 10.2; placebo+metformin 56, SD 9.7 HbA1c (%): empa 10 mg+metformin 7.94, SD 0.79; empa 25 mg+metformin 7.86, SD 0.87; placebo+metformin 7.90, SD 0.88 BMI (kg/m2): empa 10 mg+metformin 29.1, SD 5.5; empa 25 mg+metformin 29.7, SD 5.7; placebo+metformin 28.7, SD 5.2 | Intervention
|
Roden et al20 Setting: multicentre (n=124) in 9 countries (Belgium, Canada, China, Germany, India, Japan, Switzerland and USA) Design: double-blind parallel-group RCT, monotherapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 899 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes with no previous history to treatment (oral or injected hypoglycaemic agents 12 weeks prior to randomisation) Age (years): empa 10 mg 56.2, SD 11.6; empa 25 mg 53.8, SD 11.6; placebo 54.9, SD 10.9 HbA1c (%): empa 10 mg 7.87, SD 0.88; empa 25 mg 7.86, SD 0.85; placebo 7.91, SD 0.87 BMI (kg/m2): empa 10 mg 28.3, SD 5.5; empa 25 mg 28.2, SD 5.5; placebo 28.7, SD 6.2 | Intervention
|
Luseogliflozin | ||
Seino et al21 Setting: multicentre (n=23) in Japan Design: double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, comparative, RCT, monotherapy Duration: 24 weeks | N: 158 Participants: patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes on stable diet therapy for ≥6 weeks and not on any antidiabetic drugs Age (years): luseo 2.5 mg 58.9, SD 10.1; placebo 59.6, SD 9.3 HbA1c (%): luseo 2.5 mg 8.14, SD 0.91; placebo 8.17, SD 0.80 BMI (kg/m2): luseo 2.5 mg 25.98, SD 4.88; placebo 25.34, SD 4.19 | Intervention
|
Ipragliflozin | ||
Kashiwagi et al24 Setting: multicentre (n=34) in Japan Design: double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT with a 28 weeks open-label extension Duration: 24 weeks with a 28 weeks open-label extension | N: 168 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes of ≥12 weeks of duration, treated with metformin for ≥6 weeks and with an HbA1c level of 7.4–9.9% and BMI of 20–45 kg/m2 Age (years): ipra 50 mg 56.2, SD 10.67; placebo 57.7, SD 9.24 HbA1c (%): ipra 50 mg 8.25, SD 0.719; placebo 8.38, SD 0.738 BMI (kg/m2): ipra 50 mg 25.96, SD 4.410; placebo 25.47, SD 3.092 | Intervention
|
Togoliflozin | ||
Kaku et al23 Setting: multicentre (n=33) in specialists and non-specialists hospital in Japan Design: double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group RCT Duration: 24 weeks | N: 235 Participants: patients with type 2 diabetes naïve to drug therapy but, only treated with diet and exercise for ≥8 weeks before screening, HbA1c level of ≥7.3% to <10.3%, BMI of ≥18.5 to <45 kg/m2, per cent changes in HbA1c and body weight from the provisional registration visit to the final registration visit of ≤10% and <5%, respectively, controlled BP and those requiring antihypertensives only those who did not require changing of their dosing regimen. Patients using other antidiabetic drugs were eligible if they had stopped their drug ≥8 weeks before the provisional registration. (HbA1c reported in Japan Diabetes Society or JDS units but, converted to NGSP units) Age (years): tofo 10 mg 58.6, SD 9.8; tofo 20 mg 56.6, SD 10.2; tofo 40 mg 57.0, SD 9.1; placebo 56.8, SD 9.9 HbA1c (%): tofo 10 mg 8.45, SD 0.75; tofo 20 mg 8.34, SD 0.81; tofo 40 mg 8.37, SD 0.77; placebo 8.41, SD 0.78 BMI (kg/m2): tofo 10 mg 25.07, SD 3.53; tofo 20 mg 24.99, SD 4.55; tofo 40 mg 25.78, SD 4.10; placebo 26.00, SD 4.11 | Intervention
|
BMI, body mass index; cana, canagliflozin; CPR, C peptide immunoreactivity; dapa, dapagliflozin; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DEXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; empa, empagliflozin; FM, fat mass; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; FSI, fasting serum insulin; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-R, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function; ipra, ipragliflozin; luseo, luseogliflozin; NMA, network meta-analysis; NR, not reported; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PPG, postprandial glucose; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SBP, systolic blood pressure; tofo, tofogliflozin.