Table 3

Summary of results describing the relationships between BMI z-score and lifestyle behaviours, for different activity, screen time, sleep levels and dietary groups: β coefficients and 95% CIs

Model 1*Model 2†Model 3‡
Physical activity§
 Active−0.42 (−0.65 to −0.20)−0.42 (−0.65 to −0.20)−1.08 (−1.55 to −0.62)
 p Value<0.001<0.001<0.001
Screen time§
 Low ST−0.30 (−0.53 to −0.07)−0.29 (−0.52 to −0.06)−0.56 (−0.85 to −0.27)
 p Value0.0120.0140.050
Sleep duration§
 Long sleep−0.28 (−0.50 to −0.05)−0.30 (−0.51 to −0.08)−0.70 (−1.03 to −0.37)
 p Value0.0150.0080.193
Diet§
 Mixed diet0.15 (−0.11 to 0.42)0.10 (−0.16 to 0.36)−0.29 (−0.66 to 0.07)
 Healthy diet0.05 (−0.26 to 0.36)0.11 (−0.20 to 0.42)−0.20 (−0.63 to 0.24)
 p Value0.4890.7070.823
Physical activity×sleep¶
 Active, long sleep0.44 (0.01 to 0.87)
 p Value0.044
Screen time×sleep¶
 Low ST, long sleep0.66 (0.21 to 1.11)
 p Value0.004
Physical activity×diet¶
 Active, mixed diet0.74 (0.24 to 1.25)
 Active, healthy diet0.53 (−0.04 to 1.10)
 p Value0.016
  • Italic font indicates significant results.

  • *Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex and SES (parental education level), and schools are treated as random effects.

  • †Model 2: Mutually adjusted model with all covariates and independent variables entered simultaneously, with schools treated as random effects.

  • ‡Model 3=Model 2 + significant interactions.

  • §Reference categories were inactive, high ST, short sleep and unhealthy diet, respectively.

  • ¶Estimates refer to the specified groups. All other possible group combinations act as the referent group.

  • p Values are from Type 3 Tests of Fixed Effects.

  • BMI, body mass index; ST, screen time; SES, socioeconomic status.