Table 3

Quality of reporting of basic sample size elements from the CONSORT 2010 statement and the Cluster 2012 extension to the CONSORT statement

All studies
N=60
1987–2012
N=28
2013–2014
N=32
Absolute difference (95% CI)p Value
Sample size justification
 Reported45 (75.0)18 (64.3)27 (84.4)20.1 (−1.7 to 41.8)0.073
Item 1
 Level of significance39 (65.0)16 (57.1)23 (71.8)14.7 (−9.3 to 38.8)0.233
Item 2
 Power45 (75.0)18 (64.3)27 (84.4)20.1 (−1.7 to 41.8)0.073
Item 3
 Treatment effect†33 (55.0)15 (53.6)18 (56.3)2.7 (−22.6 to 27.9)0.835
Item 4
 Consistency with primary outcome38 (63.3)14 (50.0)24 (75.0)25.0 (1.2 to 48.8)0.045
Item 5
 Allowance for attrition18 (30.0)7 (25.0)11 (34.4)9.4 (−13.6 to 32.4)0.429
Item 6
 Number of clusters58 (96.7)27 (96.4)31 (96.9)0.4 (−8.7 to 9.6)0.923
 Median cluster size39 (65.0)15 (53.6)24 (75.0)21.4 (−2.4 to 45.2)0.083
Item 7
 Variation in cluster size*6 (10.0)1 (3.6)5 (15.6)12.1 (−2.3 to 26.4)0.201
Item 8
 Variation in outcome across clusters (ie, ICC)33 (55.0)11 (39.3)22 (68.8)29.5 (5.3 to 53.7)0.022
Item 9
 Uncertainty of ICC (or equivalent)*8 (13.3)3 (10.7)5 (15.6)4.9 (−12.1 to 21.9)0.712
All ItemS
 Number items reported median (IQR)5.0 (2.5–6.0)4.0 (1.0–6.0)6.0 (5.0–6.0)1.22 (0.07 to 2.36)0.067
 Reporting all nine items0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)  
  • Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated. p Value is for the comparison of 1987–2012 publications and 2013–2014 publications using a χ2 test for proportions (categorical outcomes) or Mann-Whitney U test (where medians are reported), or (*) using Fisher's exact test.

  • †A sufficient reporting of the treatment effect consists of either a standardised effect size; a mean difference and SD; means in both arms and SD; proportions in both arms; proportion in one arm and a difference.

  • ICC, intracluster correlation.