Table 2

Effect of BF at the time of gluten introduction on the development of CD

ReferenceNumber of infants/children enrolledEffect of BF during gluten introductionEffect sizeGRADE scoreBias risk
Retrospective studies
 Fälth-Magnusson et al19Biopsy-proven CD=72
controls=264
ProtectiveOR 0.35 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.66)2High
 Ascher et al2085 (8 found to have silent CD at biopsy)NoneNS2High
 Peters et al23Biopsy-proven CD=143
controls=137
ProtectiveOR 0.46 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.78)1High
Prospective studies
 Ivarsson et al21Biopsy-proven CD=627
controls=1254
ProtectiveOR 0.55 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.77)2High
 Norris et al151560 (51 developed CD autoimmunity*)NoneOR=1.32 (95% CI 0.76 to 2.28)3Medium
 Størdal et al26Biopsy-proven CD=324
controls=81 834
NoneBF >1 months after introduction
OR 1.17 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.87)
BF <1 months after introduction
OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.14)
3High
 Vriezinga et al13944 (105 developed CD autoimmunity,* out of them 77 biopsy-proven overt CD)NoneOR=1.35 (95% CI 0.57 to 4.1)4Low
 Lionetti et al12832 (117 developed CD autoimmunity,* out of them 86 biopsy-proven overt CD)OneCD autoimmunity
OR=1.5 (95% CI 0.77 to 3.0)
Overt CD
OR=1 (95% CI 0.6 to 2.3)
4Low
 Aronsson et al166434 (773 developed autoimmunity,* 307 overt biopsy-proven CD)NoneOvert CD
OR=1.13 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.46)
3Medium
  • *Outcome of CD autoimmunity has been considered the serological positivity of tTG antibodies.

  • BF, breast feeding; CD, celiac disease; NS, not significant; tTG, tissue transglutaminase.