%0 Journal Article %A Miew Keen Choong %A Guy Tsafnat %A Peter Hibbert %A William B Runciman %A Enrico Coiera %T Comparing clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome measures used in randomised controlled trials: a protocol %D 2015 %R 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008819 %J BMJ Open %P e008819 %V 5 %N 9 %X Introduction Clinical quality indicators are necessary to monitor the performance of healthcare services. The development of indicators should, wherever possible, be based on research evidence to minimise the risk of bias which may be introduced during their development, because of logistic, ethical or financial constraints alone. The development of automated methods to identify the evidence base for candidate indicators should improve the process of indicator development. The objective of this study is to explore the relationship between clinical quality indicators for asthma management in children with outcome and process measurements extracted from randomised controlled clinical trial reports.Methods and analysis National-level indicators for asthma management in children will be extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse (NQMC) database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards. Outcome measures will be extracted from published English language randomised controlled trial (RCT) reports for asthma management in children aged below 12 years. The two sets of measures will be compared to assess any overlap. The study will provide insights into the relationship between clinical quality indicators and measurements in RCTs. This study will also yield a list of measurements used in RCTs for asthma management in children, and will find RCT evidence for indicators used in practice.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not necessary because this study will not include patient data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. %U https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/5/9/e008819.full.pdf