Article
Locked-in syndrome: improvement in the prognosis after an early intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation1

Presented in part at the National Congress of PM&R, October 2000, Napoli, Italy; the National Congress of Neurorehabilitation, October 2000, Riva del Garda, Italy; and the 4th World Congress on Brain Injury, May 2001, Torino, Italy.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00008-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Casanova E, Lazzari RE, Lotta S, Mazzucchi A. Locked-in syndrome: improvement in the prognosis after an early intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Objective:

To evaluate prognosis and recovery in patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) receiving early intensive rehabilitative care.

Design:

Consecutive sample and follow-up for 5 months to 6 years.

Setting:

Three rehabilitation centers in Italy.

Participants:

Fourteen patients with LIS who underwent the same treatment and subsequently recovered.

Interventions:

Intensive nursing care and intensive and early rehabilitative program, including physiotherapy and respiratory, swallowing, and speech training. For 4 patients, occupational therapy was performed; 4 subjects also had oculomotor training. After discharge, rehabilitative maintenance care continued for each patient.

Main Outcome Measures:

Motor recovery according to the Patterson and Grabois classification, functional improvement, and mortality rate.

Results:

A significant motor recovery was found in 21% of subjects, within 3 to 6 months of onset of the morbid event; complete swallow recovery in 42%; verbal communication in 28%; communication through devices in 42%; effective bladder and bowel control in 35%; and good breathing patterns in 50%. At follow-up, the mortality rate was 14% and only 2 complications were reported.

Conclusions:

Intensive and early rehabilitation, begun within about 1 month of the morbid event, improved the functional recovery and reduced the mortality rate, which, as reported in the literature, had been 60% about 10 years ago. Further studies are necessary to confirm these data.

Section snippets

Participants

From 1995 until 2001, 14 patients with LIS, at different times and at different periods after the morbid event, were hospitalized in the 3 participating centers and selected for this study. The follow-up has continued for a range of time between 5 months and 6 years—at the beginning during the hospitalization and subsequently by telephone contact.

We decided not to establish a control group, for ethical reasons and because of the rarity of LIS. Hence, all patients with LIS were admitted to the

Results

The subjects with LIS were 9 men and 5 women (table 3); their mean age at onset was 44.7 years (range, 16–71y). The etiology was vascular in 11 cases and traumatic in the remaining 3 cases. Disorders of protein S, unknown before the illness, were found in 2 patients, and intake of drugs, such as hormone, was discovered in the history of 2 others. Moreover, before the onset of LIS, 1 patient was positive for HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) and 2 others had a diagnosis of hypertension.

Discussion

The population with LIS analyzed in our 3 centers does not appear substantially dissimilar from patients with LIS described elsewhere in the literature. In fact, in our population, the mean age at onset was 44.7 years; 9 were men (64%) and 5 (35%) women, and the etiology was vascular in 11 cases (78%) and traumatic in 3 (21%). In Patterson and Grabois’s literature review,4 the mean age of patients with LIS was 52 years, 85 (62%) were men and 52 (38%) were women, and the most common etiologic

Conclusions

After studying a consecutive sample of 14 patients with LIS hospitalized in our centers, and after comparing our results with the data reported in the literature, it seems that an intensive and early multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment, begun, when possible, within about 1 month of the onset of the morbid event, improved health status at follow-up and reduced the mortality rate below 60%, as reported by several researchers about 10 years ago. In addition, in our case series, the recovery

References (10)

  • M. Reznik

    Neuropathology in seven cases of locked-in syndrome

    J Neurol Sci

    (1983)
  • F. Plum et al.

    The diagnosis of stupor and coma

    (1966)
  • G. Bauer et al.

    Varieties of locked-in syndrome

    J Neurol

    (1979)
  • T.R. Katz et al.

    Long-term survival, prognosis, and life-care planning for 29 patients with chronic locked-in syndrome

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1992)
  • J.R. Patterson et al.

    Locked-in syndromea review of 139 cases

    Stroke

    (1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (82)

  • Consciousness in the Locked-In Syndrome

    2015, The Neurology of Consciousness: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropathology
  • Locked-in syndrome revisited

    2023, Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
View all citing articles on Scopus
1

No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

View full text