Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among breast cancer patients

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Only 3% of women with breast cancer participate in cancer clinical trials nationwide. The lack of awareness about clinical trials is a significant barrier towards clinical trials participation. A study was conducted at a large urban Comprehensive Cancer Center to test (1) the effectiveness of an 18-min educational video on improving attitudes toward clinical trials and trials enrollment among new breast cancer patients seen at the Karmanos Cancer Institute, and (2) to assess racial differences in attitudes regarding clinical trials. Participants were randomized to either the educational intervention prior to their first oncology clinic appointment or to standard care. A baseline and 2-week post-intervention survey to assess attitudes toward clinical trials participation was completed by participants. Of 218 subjects recruited, 196 (55% white vs. 45% African American (AA)) eligible patients were included in the analysis. A small increase in therapeutic clinical trial enrollment was observed in the intervention arm but was not statistically significant (10.4% vs. 6.1%; P = 0.277). The intervention also did not result in a clear improvement in patients’ attitudes toward clinical trials at posttest. However, a lower enrollment rate for the AA women was noted after adjusting for stage (OR = 0.282, P = 0.049). Significantly more negative scores were noted in 3 out of the 5 baseline attitudinal scales for AA women. The educational video did not significantly increase enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials. The findings that AA women had significantly more negative attitudes toward clinical trials than white women may partially explain the racial disparity in enrollment. An educational video remains a simple and cost-effective way to educate patients. Future studies should focus on designing a new educational video to specifically target cultural and attitudinal barriers in the AA population to more effectively change attitudes and increase trial enrollment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lukens JN (1994) Progress resulting from clinical trials. Solid tumors in childhood cancer. Cancer 74(9 Suppl):2710–2718. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+<2710::AID-CNCR2820741821>3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cobau CD (1994) Clinical trials in the community. The community clinical oncology program experience. Cancer 74(9 Suppl):2694–2700. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+<2694::AID-CNCR2820741819>3.0.CO;2-D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stiller CA (1994) Centralised treatment, entry to trials and survival. Br J Cancer 70(2):352–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Du W, Reeves JH, Gadgeel S et al (2000) Cost-effectiveness and lung cancer clinical trials. Cancer 98(7):1491–1496. doi:10.1002/cncr.11659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansen MA, Mayer DK, Hoover HC Jr (1991) Obstacles to implementing cancer clinical trials. Semin Oncol Nurs 7(4):260–267. doi:10.1016/0749-2081(91)90064-V

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swanson GM, Ward AJ (1995) Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(23):1747–1759. doi:10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon MS, Du W, Flaherty L et al (2004) Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol 22(11):2046–2052. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Du W, Gadgeel SM, Simon MS (2006) Predictors of enrollment in lung cancer clinical trials. Cancer 106(2):420–425. doi:10.1002/cncr.21638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown DR, Fouad MN, Basen-Engquist K et al (2000) Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S13–S21. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00197-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Giuliano AR, Mokuau N, Hughes C et al (2000) Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S22–S34. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00195-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gotay CC (1991) Accrual to cancer clinical trials: directions from the research literature. Soc Sci Med 33(5):569–577. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90214-W

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Winn RJ (1994) Obstacles to the accrual of patients to clinical trials in the community setting. Semin Oncol 21(4 Suppl 7):112–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Adams-Campbell LL, Ahaghotu C, Gaskins M et al (2004) Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: study design barriers. J Clin Oncol 22(4):730–734. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.03.160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellis PM, Butow PN, Simes RJ et al (1999) Barriers to participation in randomized clinical trials for early breast cancer among Australian cancer specialists. Aust N Z J Surg 69(7):486–491. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01608.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cunny KA, Miller HW (1994) Participation in clinical drug studies: motivations and barriers. Clin Ther 16(2):273–282 discussion 271–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Millon-Underwood S (1994) Increasing the participation of Minorities and other at-risk groups in clinical trials. Innov Oncol Nurs 10(4):105–106

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fouad MN, Partridge E, Green BL et al (2000) Minority recruitment in clinical trials: a conference at Tuskegee, researchers and the community. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S35–S40. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00199-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shavers VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF (2000) Knowledge of the Tuskegee study and its impact on the willingness to participate in medical research studies. J Natl Med Assoc 92(12):563–572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinto HA, McCaskill-Stevens W, Wolfe P, Marcus AC (2000) Physician perspectives on increasing minorities in cancer clinical trials: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Initiative. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S78–S84. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00191-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (2002) Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet. Ann Oncol 13(9):1414–1423. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdf255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallace K, Fleshner N, Jewett M et al (2006) Impact of a multi-disciplinary patient education session on accrual to a difficult clinical trial: the Toronto experience with the surgical prostatectomy versus interstitial radiation intervention trial. J Clin Oncol 24(25):4158–4162. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimmick GG, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB et al (2005) Improving accrual of older persons to cancer treatment trials: a randomized trial comparing an educational intervention with standard information: CALGB 360001. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2201–2207. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.01.222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Du W, Mood D, Gadgeel S et al (2008) An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among lung cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol 3(1):23–29. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31815e8bb2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Andersen R, Kravits J, Anderson O (1975) Equity in health services: empirical analysis in social policy. Ballinger Publishing Company, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Redlich FC, Hollingshead AB, Bellis E (1955) Social class differences in attitudes toward psychiatry. Am J Orthopsychiatry 25(1):60–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fouad MN, Partridge E, Wynn T et al (2001) Statewide Tuskegee Alliance for clinical trials. A community coalition to enhance minority participation in medical research. Cancer 91(1 Suppl):237–241. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1+<237::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-U

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris Interactive (2001) Nationwide survey reveals public support of clinical research studies on the rise: More education about patient protection measures needed to further this growing trend. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=323. Harris Interactive Healthcare News 2001

  28. Harris Interactive (2001) Misconceptions and lack of awareness greatly reduce recruitment for cancer clinical trials. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/about/vert_healthcare.as0. Harris Interactive Healthcare News 2001, Issue 3

  29. Gross CP, Filardo G, Mayne ST et al (2005) The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer 103(3):483–491. doi:10.1002/cncr.20792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Susan G Komen Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Du.

Appendix A: Attitudes about clinical trials

Appendix A: Attitudes about clinical trials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, W., Mood, D., Gadgeel, S. et al. An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117, 339–347 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0311-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0311-7

Keywords

Navigation