Responses

Download PDFPDF

Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Letter to the editor
    • Shanae Davis, Nursing student University of The Bahamas
    • Other Contributors:
      • Terry Campbell, Chair of the Nursing School

    Nassau, Bahamas
    November 30th 2022

    Hamburg, Germany
    November 30th 2022

    Tae Jun Kim, Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Re: “Income and Obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis”

    Respected Editor,
    This letter serves as a response to the article published on January 5, 2018, titled “Income and Obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Firstly I would like to acknowledge the talented and intelligent authors of this research article and acknowledge their hard work with this research. Reviewing this article I was able to grasp an understanding of how low income environments contribute to obesity. On the downfall of this article it was made known that research covered the western societies excluding other regions thus leaving the possibility of assumption that risk and cause of obesity may differ in other regions.
    According to the article and the cultivation theory by George Gerbner it is proposed that there is an ongoing stigma created by watching television and the media and getting the idea of being slim. Although the study focused on low income contributing and being a factor of obesity this research could have also looked at other factors that can be a risk factor of obesity.
    Researchers did a good job executing this article topic, taking these points into consideration would he...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Re: Income and obesity: what is the direction of the relationship? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    • Lindsay S. Seymour, Nursing Student University of The Bahamas
    • Other Contributors:
      • Terry Campbell, University Nursing Lecturer

    This response is in relation to the captioned article above published on January 5, 2018. Firstly, I would like to express how astute the research is. While reading the article, I understood the correlation between low income and high risk for obesity; and the stigma among social causation. In addition, to the bias nature of various research on the topic, and the importance of researching on reverse causality of income and obesity based on the results.

    Furthermore, the research depicted the reverse causality between income and obesity. It showed links between the seven research on the reverse causalities and the bias nature of the other fourteen studies. The relation between the two variables disappeared, suggesting that the unpublished studies expected negative findings.

    I agree with the study regarding the cause of obesity that is correlated to low income, plus the evidence showed in the study supporting this claim. Researchers like Jin & Jones-Smith (2015) displays how the cause of obesity is due to poor diet and decreased physical activity related to low income.

    This leaves credible studies like Ogden, Fakhouri, Carroll, Hales, Fryar, Li & Freedman (2017) and, Levine (2011) research on the similarities between the two variables void since there was no examination of how other levels of income may impact obesity. More specifically individuals receiving low income or poverty correlates to the epidemic of subsequent obe...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.