Retrospective analysis of the national impact of industrial action by English junior doctors in 2016
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
Publication Date - String

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    The impact of the 2016 industrial action by junior doctors - a DGH perspective
    • Paul Griffiths, Specialist Registrar in Respiratory and General Internal Medicine Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Furnival, Bottle, & Aylin (1) report on the national impact as a result of industrial action during the 2016 junior doctors contract dispute, both on NHS service provision and in-hospital mortality. The information gained during a time of unprecedented national uncertainty within the NHS allows us to reflect on our preparedness and planning, and it is vital that this is done on a local level to ensure that a safe service can be provided in order to guarantee good quality care should these situations arise again.

    With that in mind, we reviewed whether there was a change in number of admissions, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality for medical patients admitted during industrial action at our district general hospital (DGH). Data for strike days were compared with equivalent non-strike days during the same month. We found no significant difference in admission numbers between strike and non-strike days (345 vs. 376), LOS (median 2 days [IQR 1-8] vs. 3 days [IQR 1-9], Z = 0.835, p= 0.40), or in-hospital mortality rate (4% vs. 7%, chi-square = 3.27, p = 0.07). However, there was significant disruption to elective services during this time in order to provide senior cover for emergency work.

    As junior doctors during the recent contract dispute and industrial action, I feel that we have a duty to assess the impact of these actions on patient care. Furnival et al. highlight the challenges faced when evaluating this impact, including difficult to measu...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.