36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION | BMJ Open

Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Archive

For authors

About

Browse by collection
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

XML

Abstracts from the 5th International Society for Evidence-Based Healthcare Congress, Kish Island, Iran

Poster

36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Janani R, Jannatdoost A, Seyedrasuli A, et al

36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION

BMJ Open 2017;7:bmjopen-2016-015415.36. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015415.36