Article Text

PDF

36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
  1. Raheleh Janani1,
  2. Abdollah Jannatdoost2,
  3. Alehe Seyedrasuli3,
  4. Leila Valizadeh4,
  5. Parvin Sarbakhsh5
  1. 1Member of educational board of nursing and midwifery faculty of Tabriz University of medical sciences, Iran
  2. 2Department of medical surgical, nursing and midwifery faculty, Tabriz University of medical sciences, Iran
  3. 3MD neonatal nursing of Alzahra hospital and head of research of Alzahra research committee, Iran
  4. 4Department of children, nursing and midwifery faculty, Tabriz University of medical sciences, Iran
  5. 5Department of statistics and epidemiology, school of public health. Tabriz University of medical sciences. Iran.

Abstract

Background and aims: Endo tracheal suctioning is a common neonatal intensive care procedure that is performed to clear trachea bronchial airways of secretions and maintain patency of the endotracheal tube in intubated infants, which may lead to complications. Two systems are available to perform ES: open suction system and closed suction system. Since bacterial airway colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and septicemia are important issues in neonatal care, recent study aims to compare side effects in two methods of endotracheal suctioning (open and closed) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation.

Methods: In current clinical trial study, 90 preterm infants of (27–34 weeks of GA) hospitalized in NICUs of Alzahra and Taleghani Teaching hospitals, (2014), elected and randomly assigned to two groups. One group was suctioned by open suctioning method and the other by closed suctioning method. However frequency of suctioning and side effects as pulmonary hemorrhage, IVH, pneumothorax, pneumonia and septicemia until extubation and duration of hospitalization were investigated and compared. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (ver. 21) and descriptive and analytic statistical methods such as x2 and independent T test analysis.

Results: Overall, there was no significant statistical difference on frequency of suctioning and side effects as pulmonary hemorrhage, IVH, pneumothorax, pneumonia and septicemia until extubation and duration of hospitalization. But all side effects and mortality rate were higher in open suction.

Conclusion: Evidence indicates that, there was no significant statistical difference on frequency of suctioning, side effects and duration of hospitalization. Considering clinical significance with regard to Evidenc-Based Clinical Decision Making, it is recommended that a comprehensive study over a greater population of premature infants should be carried out.

  • Open endotracheal suction
  • Closed endotracheal suction
  • Side effect
  • Premature infants
  • Mechanical ventilation.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.