Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Permanent work disability before and after ischaemic heart disease or stroke event: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Sweden
  1. Jenni Ervasti1,
  2. Marianna Virtanen1,2,
  3. Tea Lallukka1,3,
  4. Emilie Friberg2,
  5. Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz2,
  6. Erik Lundström4,
  7. Kristina Alexanderson2
  1. 1 Research and Service Centre of Occupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2 Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  4. 4 Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jenni Ervasti; jenni.ervasti{at}ttl.fi

Abstract

Objectives We examined the risk of disability pension before and after ischaemic heart disease (IHD) or stroke event, the burden of stroke compared with IHD and which factors predicted disability pension after either event.

Design A population-based cohort study with follow-up 5 years before and after the event. Register data were analysed with general linear modelling with binary and Poisson distributions including interaction tests for event type (IHD/stroke).

Setting and participants All people living in Sweden, aged 25‒60 years at the first event year, who had been living in Sweden for 5 years before the event and had no indication of IHD or stroke prior to the index event in 2006‒2008 were included, except for cases in which death occurred within 30 days of the event. People with both IHD and stroke were excluded, resulting in 18 480 cases of IHD (65%) and 9750 stroke cases (35%).

Primary outcome measures Disability pension.

Results Of those going to suffer IHD or stroke event, 25% were already on disability pension a year before the event. The adjusted OR for disability pension at first postevent year was 2.64-fold (95% CI 2.25 to 3.11) for people with stroke compared with IHD. Economic inactivity predicted disability pension regardless of event type (OR=3.40; 95% CI 2.85 to 4.04). Comorbid mental disorder was associated with the greatest risk (OR=3.60; 95% CI 2.69 to 4.83) after an IHD event. Regarding stroke, medical procedure, a proxy for event severity, was the largest contributor (OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.43 to 3.60).

Conclusions While IHD event was more common, stroke involved more permanent work disability. Demographic, socioeconomic and comorbidity-related factors were associated with disability pension both before and after the event. The results help occupational and other healthcare professionals to identify vulnerable groups at risk for permanent labour market exclusion after such an event.

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Cohort studies
  • Disability pension
  • Ischaemic heart disease
  • Occupational Health
  • Sick leave
  • Stroke

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • EPICOH 2017, Edinburgh, August 28-31

  • Contributors JE, MV, TL, EMR and KA contributed to conception and design. JE analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed either to analysis, interpretation or acquisition of the data, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects ensuring integrity and accuracy.

  • Funding This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare. JE, MV and TL were supported by the Academy of Finland (projects 258598, 292824, 287488). The funding organisations had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, writing the report, or in the decision to submit the paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data available.