Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, correlates and interventions among Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: a scoping review protocol
  1. Jodie C Avery1,2,
  2. Jacqueline A Bowden1,3,
  3. Joanne Dono1,
  4. Odette R Gibson4,
  5. Aimee Brownbill1,
  6. Wendy Keech4,
  7. David Roder5,
  8. Caroline L Miller1,6
  1. 1 Population Health Research Group, South Australian Health and Medical ResearchInstitute, Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  2. 2 School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  3. 3 School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  4. 4 Wardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and MedicalResearch Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  5. 5 Centre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  6. 6 School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jodie C Avery; jodie.avery{at}adelaide.edu.au

Abstract

Introduction Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities of Australia experience poorer health outcomes in the areas of overweight and obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Contributing to this burden of disease in the Australian community generally and in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, is the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). We have described a protocol for a review to systematically scope articles that document use of SSBs and interventions to reduce their consumption with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. These results will inform future work that investigates interventions aimed at reducing harm associated with SSB consumption.

Methods and analysis This scoping review draws on a methodology that uses a six-step approach to search databases including PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Informit (including Informit: Indigenous Peoples), Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database and Mura, between January 1980 and February 2017. Two reviewers will be engaged to search for and screen studies independently, using formulated selection criteria, for inclusion in our review. We will include primary research studies, systematic reviews including meta-analysis or meta-synthesis, reports and unpublished grey literature. Results will be entered into a table identifying study details and characteristics, summarised using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis chart and then critically analysed.

Ethics and dissemination This review will not require ethics committee review. Results will be disseminated at appropriate scientific meetings, as well as through the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community.

  • sugar-sweetened beverages
  • soft drinks
  • sodas
  • cola
  • cordial
  • flavoured water
  • energy drink
  • sports drinks
  • aboriginal
  • indigenous
  • Australia
  • interventions
  • strategies

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JCA is the guarantor. JAB, CLM and DR conceived the idea for the project. JCA drafted the manuscript. AB assisted with the preliminary literature search. JCA, JAB, JD and CLM developed the research question. JD and CLM provided expertise on sugar sweetened beverages. ORG and WK provided expertise in the area of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research, the relevance of the research direction and method to answer the question. All authors contributed to the development of the selection criteria. All authors read, provided feedback and approved the manuscript.

  • Funding This work was supported by the University of South Australia and the NHMRC Program Grant no. 631947.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.