Article Text
Abstract
Objective To study the effectiveness of four cycles of intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian stimulation (OS) by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or by clomiphene citrate (CC), and adherence to strict cancellation criteria.
Setting Randomised controlled trial among 22 secondary and tertiary fertility clinics in the Netherlands.
Participants 732 women from couples diagnosed with unexplained or mild male subfertility and an unfavourable prognosis according to the model of Hunault of natural conception.
Interventions Four cycles of IUI–OS within a time horizon of 6 months comparing FSH 75 IU with CC 100 mg. The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy conceived within 6 months after randomisation, defined as a positive heartbeat at 12 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes are cancellation rates, number of cycles with a monofollicular or with multifollicular growth, number of follicles >14 mm at the time of ovulation triggering, time to ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth and multiple pregnancy. We will also assess if biomarkers such as female age, body mass index, smoking status, antral follicle count and endometrial aspect and thickness can be used as treatment selection markers.
Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Academic Medical Centre and from the Dutch Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects (CCMO NL 43131-018-13). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international scientific meetings.
Trial registration number NTR4057.
- Unexplained subfertility
- mild male factor subfertility
- intra uterine insemination
- ovarian stimulation
- clomiphene citrate
- follicle stimulating hormone
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors ND is responsible for the overall logistical aspects of the trial and drafted the paper. MHM, FvdV and MvW designed the trial and were responsible for the development of the protocol. ND, CK, JG, JPdB, BJC, DPvdH, NFK, MHAvH, FB, KF, CAHJ, JMRvW, JvD, M Twisk, M Traas, MFGV, MJP, JV, DAMP, DESB, HRV, CFvH, BWJM, SR, MHM and MvW contributed to the protocol included patients and approved the final version of the paper.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Approved by METC AMC Amsterdam.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.