Article Text

Download PDFPDF

How does a physical activity programme in elementary school affect fracture risk? A prospective controlled intervention study in Malmo, Sweden
  1. Marcus E Cöster1,
  2. Jesper Fritz1,
  3. Jan-Åke Nilsson1,
  4. Caroline Karlsson1,
  5. Björn E Rosengren1,
  6. Magnus Dencker2,
  7. Magnus K Karlsson1
  1. 1Department of Orthopedics and Clinical Sciences, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Malmö, Sweden
  2. 2Department of Physiology and Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Marcus E Cöster; marcus.coster{at}med.lu.se

Abstract

Objectives Recent evidence from the 7-year follow-up of the Pediatric Osteoporosis Prevention (POP) study indicates an inverse correlation between years of participation in a physical activity (PA) intervention and fracture risk in children. However, we could not see a statistically significant reduction in fracture risk, which urged for an extension of the intervention.

Setting The study was conducted in 4 neighbouring elementary schools, where 1 school functioned as intervention school.

Participants We included all children who began first grade in these 4 schools between 1998 and 2012. This resulted in 1339 children in the intervention group and 2195 children in the control group, all aged 6–8 years at the state of the study.

Intervention We launched an 8-year intervention programme with 40 min of moderate PA per school day, while the controls continued with the Swedish national standard of 60 min of PA per week.

Primary outcome measure We used the regional radiographic archive to register objectively verified fractures and we estimated annual fracture incidences and incidence rate ratios (IRRs).

Results During the first year after initiation of the intervention, the fracture IRR was 1.65 (1.05 to 2.08) (mean 95% CI). For each year of the study, the fracture incidence rate in the control group compared with the intervention group increased by 15.7% (5.6% to 26.8%) (mean 95% CI). After 8 years, the IRR of fractures was 52% lower in the intervention group than in the control group (IRR 0.48 (0.25 to 0.91) (mean 95% CI))].

Conclusions Introduction of the school-based intervention programme is associated with a higher fracture risk in the intervention group during the first year followed by a gradual reduction, so that during the eighth year, the fracture risk was lower in the intervention group.

Trial registration number NCT00633828.

  • SPORTS MEDICINE
  • PUBLIC HEALTH

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • MEC and JF contributed equally.

  • Contributors MEC and JF did all calculations, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. J-ÅN supervised the statistical analyses and the interpretation of the data. BER and MD collected data, planned the analyses and drafted the manuscript. CK drafted the manuscript. MKK designed the study, collected data and supervised all the work.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Centre for Athletic Research, the Herman Järnhardt Foundation, Skåne Regional Foundations and ALF Foundations.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval Ethics Committee of Lund University, Sweden.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No additional data are available.