Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy

Vít Procházka; Miloslav Klugar; Veronika Bachanova; Jitka Klugarová; Dagmar Tučková; Tomáš Papajík

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729

Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Archive

For authors

About

Browse by collection
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

PDF

XML

Oncology

Protocol

Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Procházka V, Klugar M, Bachanova V, et al

Comparing the accuracy of quantitative versus qualitative analyses of interim PET to prognosticate Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review protocol of diagnostic test accuracy

BMJ Open 2016;6:e011729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011729

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password